[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Search engine manipulation effect: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

22 October 2024

9 October 2024

7 February 2024

18 December 2023

22 November 2023

22 October 2023

28 September 2023

11 August 2023

15 May 2023

9 April 2023

30 January 2023

14 January 2023

30 November 2022

5 November 2022

16 July 2022

5 June 2022

23 May 2022

  • curprev 15:5415:54, 23 May 2022 SnowFire talk contribs 7,904 bytes −3,836 The fraud allegation is also wrong - even if Google really was favoring Clinton in 2016, that still isn't fraud, any more than Fox News favoring Trump was fraud. The entire European antitrust lawsuit is OR / coatrack - it was not based on Epstein's research. Clinton stuff also includes some stuff that is both unrelated and wrong on its face - Google and Bing have different search results, so that means Google is biased? What? undo
  • curprev 08:0108:01, 23 May 2022 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 11,740 bytes +28 Dating maintenance tags: {{Mergeto}} {{Notability}} undo
  • curprev 07:4107:41, 23 May 2022 SnowFire talk contribs 11,712 bytes +42 Propose merge. This is just one guy's theory who is operating way out of his expertise. There's no substantive backing - the other sources are stuff like The Washington Times, which just want to be flattered. It was also demonstrably wrong (Epstein thought that Google had locked up the election for Clinton in 2016), not that this matters that much. undo

17 April 2022

16 January 2022

24 October 2021

17 September 2021

29 April 2021

23 March 2021

22 January 2021

14 December 2020

17 November 2020

31 October 2020

18 June 2020

20 March 2020

9 December 2018

9 July 2018

17 May 2018

21 August 2017

22 April 2017

11 March 2017

20 December 2016

16 December 2016

13 August 2016

22 July 2016

  • curprev 06:5406:54, 22 July 2016 Kepija talk contribs 11,356 bytes −655 Requires more specific data to establish the validity of study with regards to whether Arizona crowdsourcing website generates traffic that legitimately can be extrapolated as applicable across US. Cherry picks data then phrasing labors to trash R's. undo
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)