Talk:5 euro note: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:40, 28 November 2011

5 euro note has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 27, 2011.

Numismatics B‑class Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:European Union

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Template:Maintained

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:5 euro note/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Oddbodz (talk · contribs) 22:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC) This is a very good article. It is quite short but is still broad and accurate in its coverage. All key points have citations and the article is nutral. There are some good images all though a few more wouldn't hurt. The article meets all the Good Article and I am happy to award it Good Article status.[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 {{British-English}}
 {{maintained|{{user|Plarem}}}}
+{{Talk:5 euro note/GA1}}