[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Compossibility

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Eleuthero (talk | contribs) at 00:58, 16 June 2009 (→‎References?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Logic Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Logic

References?

Let's get a citation for what works this word is used in. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • While this would certainly help--I am having a hard time thinking of philosophy texts on related subjects that don't... it may simply be "common knowledge" for the field. However--looking specifically at the Reformed scholastic period--> any text on modalism in the early Enlightenment, late Renaissance (including books on Reformed scholastics) is probably going to touch on this. If you are interested in the subject, Reformation and Scholasticism (ed., W. van Asselt) is a good start and hits the relationship in the period between philosophy and religion fairly well too.