Talk:Compossibility: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m →References?: signature |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==References?== |
==References?== |
||
Let's get a citation for what works this word is used in. [[User:NickelShoe|NickelShoe]] ([[User talk:NickelShoe|Talk]]) 19:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC) |
Let's get a citation for what works this word is used in. [[User:NickelShoe|NickelShoe]] ([[User talk:NickelShoe|Talk]]) 19:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
* While this would certainly help--I am having a hard time thinking of philosophy texts on related subjects that don't... it may simply be "common knowledge" for the field. However--looking specifically at the Reformed scholastic period--> any text on modalism in the early Enlightenment, late Renaissance (including books on Reformed scholastics) is probably going to touch on this. If you are interested in the subject, Reformation and Scholasticism (ed., W. van Asselt) is a good start and hits the relationship in the period between philosophy and religion fairly well too. |
* While this would certainly help--I am having a hard time thinking of philosophy texts on related subjects that don't... it may simply be "common knowledge" for the field. However--looking specifically at the Reformed scholastic period--> any text on modalism in the early Enlightenment, late Renaissance (including books on Reformed scholastics) is probably going to touch on this. If you are interested in the subject, Reformation and Scholasticism (ed., W. van Asselt) is a good start and hits the relationship in the period between philosophy and religion fairly well too.--[[User:Eleuthero|eleuthero]] ([[User talk:Eleuthero|talk]]) 00:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:58, 16 June 2009
Philosophy: Logic Unassessed | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
References?
Let's get a citation for what works this word is used in. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:40, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- While this would certainly help--I am having a hard time thinking of philosophy texts on related subjects that don't... it may simply be "common knowledge" for the field. However--looking specifically at the Reformed scholastic period--> any text on modalism in the early Enlightenment, late Renaissance (including books on Reformed scholastics) is probably going to touch on this. If you are interested in the subject, Reformation and Scholasticism (ed., W. van Asselt) is a good start and hits the relationship in the period between philosophy and religion fairly well too.--eleuthero (talk) 00:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)