[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Criminal conspiracy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 81.105.242.11 (talk) at 07:29, 13 October 2008 (→‎A European view: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconLaw B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A European view

I can see the argument for this, but to me it looks like:

a) prosecution of precrime - ie. for things which have yet to occur and that once prevented, will not. Sanction against non-events?!

b) having the sanction against an offence increased by addition of extra charges of conspiracy as if it made it worse simply because it involved the agreement of others. Why is 10 people together prosecuted as 20 crimes, where 10 people separately is 10 crimes?

It looks like a very strict American justice system. --81.105.242.11 (talk) 07:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]