[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:God

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 72.209.69.251 (talk) at 15:52, 19 September 2007 (→‎Controversial Edit). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleGod has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 22, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 13, 2005Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Template:WP1.0

Template:FAOL

Archive
Archives
  1. 2001 - 2003
  2. 9th January - 2nd November 2003
  3. 10th January - 2nd March 2004
  4. 12th April - 30th August 2004
  5. 30th October - 2nd November 2004
  6. 31st October - 15th November 2004
  7. 9th November - 16th November 2004
  8. 18th November - 20th August 2005
  9. 21st September 2005 - 26th April 2006
  10. 4th May - 20th August 2006
  11. 20th August - 27th September 2006
  12. 10th September - 29th September 2006
  13. 1st September - 29th November 2006
  14. 6th December 2006 - 5th January 2007
  15. 8th January - 23rd January 2007
  16. 11th January - 29th January 2007
  17. 2nd February - 24th May 2007
  18. 25th May - 7th June 2007
  19. 1st June - 15th June 2007
  20. 13th June - 13th August 2007

Controversial Edit

It was brought to my attention by a friend of mine that under the section titled Etymology and Usage, there was the phrase 'GOD DOESN'T EXIST'. I created this account simply to edit the section and remove that offensive statement only to find I would have to wait four days to do so. I realize that the topic of God is an easily debated subject, however, I believe this page should be dedicated to facts and not potentially offensive material. I would hope that the statement be removed and that the article return to being factual and not a billboard for rude opinions. Thank you.

Rangeley1029 21:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the vandalism. -- Gogo Dodo 21:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Technically, if this article is dedicated to facts then this phrase should be included.72.209.69.251 15:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)ForgotMyLogin[reply]

Removed non-topical edits

Hi! This talk page is for discussing the article, not for expressing ones personal thoughts on the subject. Removed non-topical entries. See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Best, --Shirahadasha 04:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Reliable sources for the term dharmic religions?

Where are the reliable sources that use the term dharmic religions in the context of this article? Dharmic religions is a now deleted obscure neologism and should not be used throughout Wikipedia. Andries 15:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to use the alternative phrase Indian religions. The number of google scholar results for "Indian religions"+"Indian religion" is (45.600 + 84.200) while it is only (492+475) for "dharmic religions" +"dharmic religion" (492+475). See Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_September_8. Andries 19:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]