Talk:Eadgyth

Untitled

I removed the 869 date because I don't know what it's referring to.

The way it was written, it looked like it was telling the reader when Edward the Elder was born, but Edward's article says he was possibly born in 871. If there's a possibility that he could've been born in 869, then that should be included in his article, not his daughter's.

I thought that the date could refer to Eadgyth's date of birth, but then that obviously doesn't make sense, unless it's a typo. Randee15 10:19, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Is Eadgyth the more usual form of her name? --Wetman 08:29, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes. Perhaps Eadgyth should be used throughout the article.68.37.168.37 (talk) 15:11, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Extra Sister

Notes on my revisions: Æthelweard reports that King Æthelstan sent two sisters to Germany (not three, as previously indicated in the article) as candidates for empress. He goes on to say that after Otto chose Edith, the other (unnamed) sister married a "regi juxta Iupitereos montes" (king near the Alps). William of Malmesbury somewhat garbles the story, saying that Otto married "Algiva" and that Edith married a "duke of the Alps". A German chronicle, Gesta Oddonis, correctly marries Otto to Edith and says that the leftover sister, "Adiva", was married off. Things get even more confusing because William of Malmesbury writes that "Edgiva, a lady of incomparable beauty, was united, by her brother, Athelstan, to Louis, prince of Aquitaine" Problem is, the only Louis of Aquitaine alive at this time was King Louis IV of France, the son of Charles III by Eadgifu of England. There's no way this "Edgiva" married her own nephew!

It's a tangle sorting this all out. Adiva/Algiva/Edgiva may have been a duplication of Eadgifu. Or she may have been a separate sister altogether. Some interesting coins have been found from this time period naming the queen of Boleslaus II the Pious of Bohemia as "Adiva". Other theorized husbands included Louis the Blind, Ebalus of Aquitaine, and Ludwig, Count in Thurgovie. Missi 09:18, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Edit summary

This is a request to please kindly give a summary of your edits, especially on this article where statements are now sometimes appearing while not backed up in the sources given. It's easy to forget to write a summary, so the my preferences link (top right of this page if you're signed in) has a facility that prompts you to write one before saving edits. If you have information which you believe to be true but you can't find the source, then may I suggest that you write it here, so that a future editor can possibly find and add the source, or discuss it as appropriate. Thank you.--Storye book (talk) 20:28, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Eadgyth. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://news.discovery.com/archaeology/english-princess-bones.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Otto wasn*t the eldest son

Henry the Fowler had an elder son, Thankmar (from his first marriage with Hatheburg). As it wasn't sure that this marriage was legal Thankmar couldn't succeed as king. Regards, Annett — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.211.197.108 (talk) 15:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)