Talk:Four Oaks, Sutton Coldfield

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Birmingham Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Four Oaks, Birmingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100416090916/http://www.londonmidland.com/your-journey/station-info/FOK/ to http://www.londonmidland.com/your-journey/station-info/FOK/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 January 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Four Oaks, Birmingham → Four Oaks, Sutton Coldfield – Although Four Oaks is within the boundaries of the City of Birmingham, it's an area of Sutton Coldfield. Peter James (talk) 17:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC) Peter James (talk) 17:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per the points at Talk:Leeds#Lead and Talk:Sutton Park, West Midlands#Requested move 5 December 2018. Its not really part of Birmingham but is definitely part of Royal Sutton Coldfield. Unlike the park which has an overlap (repeating "Sutton" if moved to Sutton Park, Sutton Coldfield) there is also one in Solihull and UKPLACE does suggest using the urban settlement for places unquestionably part of them even if unique in a county or district. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Proposed name provides a better idea about the residential location. Sdmarathe (talk) 06:43, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Sutton Coldfield is still to all intents and purposes a town in its own right. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.