[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Homer vs. Patty and Selma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ISD (talk | contribs) at 20:16, 14 April 2009 (Remove WP:Comedy per discussion here). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleHomer vs. Patty and Selma has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHomer vs. Patty and Selma is part of the The Simpsons (season 6) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 6, 2009Good article nomineeListed
February 13, 2009Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Cultural references

Bart talking with his hand socket-puppet is a reference to Señor Wences show.[1]


The above is indeed sourced, but it isn't really worth it to keep it in the article and have a one-sentence Cultural references subsection. I think with a Reception and also Themes section instead, that will be fine. Also, might expand later on using info from the sources listed in Further reading. Cirt (talk) 02:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Homer vs. Patty and Selma/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

All good, but the plot summary is about 200 words too large. On hold while concern is met. Sceptre (talk) 03:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Thank you for doing the GA Review. I have shortened the plot summary subsection by 200 words. Cirt (talk) 14:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks way better; passed. Sceptre (talk) 16:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference Mirkin was invoked but never defined (see the help page).