Talk:Lacrosse stick
This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Manufacturer Styles
[edit]Shouldn't the article say about how many different companys make different styles of sticks like the heads may have a different design or the shaft might be a square or a hexagon .--Racer38 21:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
History
[edit]Some words about the history are missing. (like how old sticks looked like) and when the first plastic stick came up.
Does anyone have anything about the transition from All wood sticks up until present day sticks?Darthjarek 07:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
'sometimes called a crosse'? how about 'properly called a crosse'?Toyokuni3 (talk) 15:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
'sometimes called a crosse'? Is this a Canadian/Quebecois term or a recent slang term? No one around Syracuse (one of the original strongholds of the sport) or the local Onondaga Reservation called it a "crosse" in the 70's or 80's. Agreed on wood to metal/plastic transition. This probably allowed the game to become widespread and should be more robustly discussed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.250.186.17 (talk) 21:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Article Sounds Like It Was Written By Stick Manufacturers
[edit]"Every lacrosse stick consists of two parts, a head and a handle. They are often purchased separately. Lacrosse heads and handles are manufactured by companies, including Warrior Lacrosse, Brine, Corp., STX, Harrow Sports, Gait/Debeer Lacrosse, and Onyx Lacrosse (formerly Shamrock Lacrosse)."
Often purchased seperately? Why would somebody write that except to sell gear with a greater mark-up. If there are no objections I am going to remove this reference and the list of commercial manufacturers. 71.231.121.77 (talk) 20:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Needs an update
[edit]The most glaring omissions from the article are the lack of historical background for the shape and design of lacrosse sticks (as well as when and how the modern stick took shape) as well as the lack of updates in terms of new technology and advances in production, such as the rise of the use of composites for lacrosse shafts. Tuckbrown8 (talk) 02:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- Feel free to step up. Be sure to provide sources. DMighton (talk) 03:13, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Diversifying Article
[edit]Since there has been a lot of useful time spent explaining the functions of a men's lacrosse stick and its NCAA regulations, should we make a separate subheading for contemporary women's lacrosse heads so that just as much information can be given for a girl's lacrosse stick as it is given for a boys lacrosse stick? Bwhit13091 (talk) 02:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Bwhit13091
- See above. DMighton (talk) 03:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Lacrosse stick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090313022252/http://www.uslacrosse.org/the_sport/mens_rules.phtml to http://www.uslacrosse.org/the_sport/mens_rules.phtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070106072048/http://intlaxfed.org/pdf/rules-2005.pdf to http://intlaxfed.org/pdf/rules-2005.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070307095814/http://www.uslacrosse.org/the_sport/womens_rules.phtml to http://www.uslacrosse.org/the_sport/womens_rules.phtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: JRN 101 News Literacy
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2022 and 12 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Syermal (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by BrieBernier24 (talk) 21:56, 15 December 2022 (UTC)