Talk:Musa va 'Uj

Musa va 'Uj has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 22, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Musa va 'Uj appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 April 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Musa va 'Uj (pictured) depicts figures from all three Abrahamic religions?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Musa va 'Uj.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 02:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Musa va 'Uj

... that the painting Musa va 'Uj (pictured) depicts figures from all three Abrahamic religions? Source: Robinson: "apparently an allegory of the Christian, Muhammedan, and Jewish religions, the latter represented by Moses striking the giant 'Uj" (ref 4).
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph (art model)

Moved to mainspace by MartinPoulter (talk). Self-nominated at 14:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Musa va 'Uj; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Verified that the article is long enough, that there are no plagiarism concerns through the Copyvios tool and spotchecking, and that the hook is sourced in the article. Cunard (talk) 05:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

PASS

Passed! Frzzl talk; contribs 14:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Musa va 'Uj/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Frzzl (talk · contribs) 13:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'll take on this review. Spotchecks will come. Frzzl talk; contribs 13:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was swift, passing. Thank you for an excellent article on a very interesting subject - I enjoyed a brief foray into Persian art! Frzzl talk; contribs 14:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Very well written indeed; refs are well formatted. ~~My only request would be to link folio in "Physical description"~~ strike that, it's so minor that I've done it.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|}y} c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Sources are reliable; eMost sources are offline, so Earwig wasn't very helpful; I couldn't really find any major problems in the sources I could access. I've added links to searchable Google Books on a couple of the refs.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article covers the main topics; it integrates background and the history of the work well
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
No problems found.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
I'd be impressed if there was an edit war on this article; it's stable and you're the main editor.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Images all have valid copyright tags; the captions are fine.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Spotchecks

I've checked all usages of the Phillips 2020, Robinson, and the Nozourian 2019. I also looked at the Rogers "The Art of Islam" - everything seems fine to me; I'm happy to AGF on the offline sources.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.