[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Sex pheromone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 11:45, 31 January 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

humans

[edit]

Would really like to see information regarding human sex pheromones in this article. I believe the subject sorely needs to be addressed. Thanks, just sharing my opinion. --sloth_monkey 11:38, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that there is no evidence for their existence, though even this would be worth mentioning. Richard001 (talk) 21:38, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From my own experience and observations , human sex pheromones do increase levels of infatuation , sexual attraction and arousal . MalcolmX86 (talk) 02:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Bitch" pheromones.

[edit]

Look, I realize completely how this is going to read. It's just as difficult to write ... The evidence that there is "something" that causes the often negative inter-female behaviour in humans, whilst of course totally anecdotal, is absolutely overwhelming. Is there any evidence that this is caused by pheromones? A good place to start would appear to be to look for it in other animals, which interestingly, in non-human cases, is almost exclusively males. Why do tomcats (indeed many other species of cats), lots of other mammals, siamese fighting fish, some birds, (the list is too numerous) fight when placed in proximity? Is it due to pheromones? Is this related to human behaviour? Noting that often a fight amongst women is called a "cat fight". Apologies in advance who finds this entire line of questioning offensive. I am trying to write this as a "scientific" question (and accept that perhaps may be failing).

"Mice-like"pheremones in humans?

[edit]

More anecdotal stuff ... a colleague who works in prosecuting child molestation offenses has made claims that there is some evidence that the pheromone mechanism described here for mice may also be at work in humans. It is a sad and well-known statistic that child molestation of girls by non-blood relatives is much higher than by blood relatives. Now whilst of course there are likely to be a number of reasons for this, is it at all possible that there is indeed such a process at work here? That some pheromones putatively emitted by girls are going to be more effective on their biological fathers than on other men? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.176.111 (talk) 06:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure which way around this question is being asked. Take "Major Histocompatibility Complex" into account more than pheromones, especially in an undeveloped child. 99.179.145.178 (talk) 13:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Listiness - rewrite needed

[edit]

The main body of this article is essentially an unstructured list of "Species with pheromones". Yes, there's no connection between chunk A and chunk B or for that matter Chunks D, E, F, G, H, I, and J. Worse, more chunklets are being added as educational projects, with no thought given to the article's [lack of] structure.

What is required is for the principal themes of pheromones to be drawn out and exemplified. There should be discussions of pheromone

  • Evolution
  • Chemistry
  • Effectiveness (range in kilometres, etc)

and so on. Any examples used will then usefully illustrate these themes. OK, I'll boldly get started on a rewrite and we'll take it from there. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]