[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:Sumner Redstone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Maxl (talk | contribs) at 17:48, 9 May 2016 (Year of marriage: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Headline text

i think i saw a ct scan on this guy once...really. can't talk about it though...

Yeah? Rhomb Rhombozoa 08:56, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

How can Kevin Bacon be owned by Sumner Redstone?

Agincourtdb 09:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible POV.

The paragrpah below in the article seems a bit opinionated. However, in this context. What do they mean by 'hostile takeover'?. A quick snatching of coporate power through possibly dishonest means?, threats of physical violence?. Could someone please clairfy this and fix the article accordingly...

After a hostile takeover in 1987, Redstone won voting control of Viacom and led a series of acquisitions to make Viacom one of the top players in modern media (along with General Electric & Vivendi's NBC-Universal, News Corporation, Time Warner, Sony, and The Walt Disney Company).

Nateland 21:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takeover

Picture?

Isn't there a public domain picture of this guy? Or, barring that, Jigsaw's puppet from the Saw movies?

I wanted to know if there was a picture of this guy as well, I mean we have people who are just plumbers with pictures on here, but this guy who runs one of the largest and most powerful media empires there is not even a snapshot of? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.50.109.207 (talk) 17:30, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Do you really want to see a picture of nosferatu? The devil will recognize his own. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.176.33.102 (talk) 06:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Agree, I think Devil doew not like to be pictured on wikipedia ;-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.108.215.226 (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jew?

In the article, it is not mentioned that he is a Jew, but he is placed in Category:American Jews. So the claim needs clarification. --Kaaveh (talk) 07:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm wondering if he changed his name to hide the fact that he's a Jew. 12:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.245.45.212 (talk)

Editing Paramount Pictures Section

I work for Rubenstein Communications and I propose the following edits on behalf of Paramount. To mitigate conflict of interest issues, I ask that an editor review the edits and take them live, as they see fit. If no objections are had and no edits are made within ten days, I will go ahead and update the entry myself. I believe these edits enhance the accuracy of the entry while adding additional citations.

NinaSpezz (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Integrated proposed edits into the entry //NinaSpezz (talk) 15:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sumner Redstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sumner Redstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sumner Redstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sumner Redstone/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Why does the article include the following sentence:

"He is one of the jews known to run the world through a vast media empire."

Is that a joke?

It should be reviewed and edited

Last edited at 13:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 07:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Manuela Herzer lawsuit

Is there any reason why the Manuela Herzer lawsuit over Redstone's competency to remove her from his health care proxy is reduced to a footnote that doesn't describe it? It meets WP:WEIGHT by the standard of massive media coverage. I also think it's important and significant as an example of the law of competency and undue influence. --Nbauman (talk) 13:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Year of marriage

In the infobox it says Mr Redstone's first marriage startet in 1944 while in the private life section it says 1947. Which is right? --Maxl (talk) 17:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]