Talk:Sunsoft
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page Moved
Moved it to the correct name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cube b3 (talk • contribs) 03:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- The copy-and-paste move to SUNSOFT has been undone. —C.Fred (talk) 03:24, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Name Correction
Sunsoft is the incorrect name. The correct name is SUNSOFT as shown in the official site. Formally requesting a page move using the Wikipedia Move Template [[1]] 2017-04-26 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billfromhk (talk • contribs) 09:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Like Sega, SUNSOFT should be in capital's it is there policy.--Cube b3 (talk) 03:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia practice is to not render all-capital names as such in articles. Compare with your example: Sega. Please see WP:ALLCAPS for further information. —C.Fred (talk) 03:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Reference suggestions
Requested move 26 April 2017
It has been proposed in this section that Sunsoft be renamed and moved to SUNSOFT. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Sunsoft → SUNSOFT – Sunsoft is the incorrect name. The correct name is SUNSOFT as shown in the official site Billfromhk (talk) 10:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:TMRULES. This doesn't appear to be an acronym and it's written this way in reliable sources. Nohomersryan (talk) 17:38, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:TMRULES, verbatim - not an acronym and written this way in reliable sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:UCRN, "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title" Consider adding something similar to "NETGEAR Inc. (stylized, trademarked, and marketed as NETGEAR)" as in NETGEAR's lede, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netgear. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 20:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Per all guidelines, this looks like it should read "Netgear Inc. (stylized, trademarked, and marketed as NETGEAR)". A more compliant (and extreme) example is the Product Red article:
- "Product Red, stylized as (PRODUCT)RED ..."
- --NapoliRoma (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- I agree and decided to make the change myself since the current version of the Netgear aricle was not consistent with standard practice. Neither this aricle, Nvidia, or the Sega article open with the styalized spelling.--64.229.167.158 (talk) 23:58, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose move per all above. ONR (talk) 22:36, 26 April 2017 (UTC)