Talk:Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union
Soviet Union: Russia / History Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
This article is about a topic whose name is originally rendered in the Cyrillic script; however the article does not have that version of its name in the article's lead paragraph. Anyone who is knowledgeable enough with the original language is invited to assist in adding the Cyrillic script. For more information, see: MOS:FOREIGN · Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Cyrillic). |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 26, 2004 and December 26, 2005. |
Law Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Soviet=Council
Why tha article not called council but "soviet"? Soviets in their original meaning refer to 1920s, while "Верховный Совет" refers to the other meaning of the word - "council" (supreme council), a "soviet" and a "council" are similar words in russian.
Name
Why isn't Supreme Council of the Soviet Union?UeArtemis (talk) 11:26, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Notable members
Would it be possible to include a list of notable members of the Supreme Soviet not on the executive level? Orville Eastland (talk) 00:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Ivan Laptev
Someone has removed Ivan Laptev from the list of Chairmen of the Supreme Soviet. I saw with my own eyes that he and Rafiq Nishonov presided over the meetings of the USSR Supreme Soviet on CNN after the failed coup d'etat in August 1991. Please do not remove him
User:Mbakkel2 20:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Intended for Talk:Supreme Soviet. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
First entry should not have an equal bullet pointThe Soviet Union was the country as a whole and the other bullet points were provinces within it. Therefore, an equal bullet point for the country along with its provinces is misleading. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 21:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC) |
Citation needed for unsupported seemingly biased statement?
" In practice, however, it functioned as a rubber stamp for decisions already made by the CPSU. This later became common practice in all Communist countries. "
Is there any citation or sources support for this? Preferably disinterested ones. The statement have an anti-soviet feeling for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.69.62.136 (talk) 04:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
More importantly is their any unbiased sources.71.17.109.113 (talk) 08:40, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Elections not mentioned yet
There are articles for all "elections" between 1946 and the end of the Sowjet Union:
- 2nd convocation session 1946 - 1950 / Soviet Union legislative election, 1946
- 3rd convocation session 1950 - 1954 / Soviet Union legislative election, 1950
- 4th convocation session 1954 - 1958 / Soviet Union legislative election, 1954
- 5th convocation session 1958 - 1962 / Soviet Union legislative election, 1958
- 6th convocation session 1962 - 1966 / Soviet Union legislative election, 1962
- 7th convocation session 1966 - 1970 / Soviet Union legislative election, 1966
- 8th convocation session 1970 - 1974 / Soviet Union legislative election, 1970
- 9th convocation session 1974 - 1979 / Soviet Union legislative election, 1974
- 10th convocation session 1979 - 1984 / Soviet Union legislative election, 1979
- 11th convocation session 1984 - 1989 / Soviet Union legislative election, 1984
Imo, they should be mentioned. Any pro's / con's ? --Neun-x (talk) 19:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
New Disambiguation Page
Depending on the era, either this or the Federal Council may be simply referred to as "The Soviet" (based on Сове́т, the Russian word for "Senate," "Upper House of Parliament," or "Governing Council"). For that reason, I will now create a Disambiguation Page to this effect. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 06:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Inconsistency
On this article it talks about how it was rubber stamp institution with no real power, however in the article for the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet it states that the Presidium (an institution that was powerful enough to remove a General Secretary at one point) was elected directly from the Supreme Soviet. Someone else also said that the rubber stamp line was biased and unsourced so it might be related.
Orchastrattor (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- The Presidium of the Supreme Soviet never had the power to remove the General Secretary of the CPSU (since that was a party office, answerable not to the Supreme Soviet or any of its subordinate bodies, but rather to the Central Committee of the CPSU). Khrushchev was removed by the Presidium of the Central Committee of the CPSU, which is what the Politburo was denominated from 1952 to 1966.—MNTRT2009 (talk) 11:15, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- Start-Class Soviet Union articles
- Mid-importance Soviet Union articles
- Start-Class Russia articles
- Mid-importance Russia articles
- Mid-importance Start-Class Russia articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- Start-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles
- Articles needing Turkmen script or text
- Selected anniversaries (December 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2005)
- Start-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles