[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Talk:War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Eleuthero (talk | contribs) at 01:58, 11 January 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconReligious texts Stub‑class (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Changing "comprised of" to "comprises"

According to Merriam Webster (http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/comprises), the compose/constitute form which includes *both* "comprises" and "comprised of" are under criticism for no apparent reason. It seems strange to change it from one critisized form to another. Since I'm not married to the word, I'm going to just remove it.

"congregation of the gods"

Considering that the religion this pertains to is monotheistic, should this not read "congregation of God"? -- EmperorBMA|話す 21:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not necessarily - the canonical scriptures (both Jewish and Christian) refer to the "congregation of the gods" on occasion with reference to human rulers or angelic beings under the authority of the one God. This does not indicate henotheism but instead allows for multiple understandings of "gods" - to further convolute matters, "congregation of the gods" or other similar phrases is sometimes used in a derogatory sense (Psalms 82 and 96) indicating the reality of the one God and the unreality of the gods of the other peoples.--eleuthero (talk) 01:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]