User:Afk2231/Quantum machine learning/AsherJ22 Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]General info
[edit]Lead
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Could be more in depth.
Lead evaluation
[edit]Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added relevant to the topic?
- It is relevant and also brought in a new section.
- Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
- Brings in a new topic about the skepticism of quantum machine learning which was not previously addressed in the quantum machine learning wiki page.
Content evaluation
[edit]Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added neutral?
- The first source is not so reliable/resourceful. It is from a .com and is not a scientific article. The quotes that you added on your sandbox are quotes from that article. You should try finding scientific article to back up what those people were saying.
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Partially. Again, there are quotes from three people saying it is hard.
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- There needs to be more research from more articles, especially need to find scientific articles.
- Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- In a way.
Now that i think about it, the section about skepticism as a whole is not a neutral section to have.
Sources and References
[edit]Again, I do not think that there are enough sources to only use ones from non-scientific journals.
Organization
[edit]Why are there so many things crossed out? Did not even finish a few sentences.
Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
NA
For New Articles Only
[edit]If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- Does not meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements
Overall impressions
[edit]I think that there are interesting sections in the Quantum Machine Learning wiki page that could definitely be added to as there are some sections that are just short paragraphs.