User talk:ArcAngel
April 2023
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to John P. Stenbit: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Just a suggestion from me to count how many times the user has been warned so that other editors can take actions accordingly. Thank you, Happy editing! NP83 (talk) 21:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I've got Twinkle so I have them already. Since I do some editing at work, I got distracted and forgot to add the notice. ArcAngel (talk) 23:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Sarah Bedi for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Bedi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
scope_creepTalk 08:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Please undo your close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KJTB-LD, it violates WP:NACD and WP:BADNAC per the Do not close discussions in which you have offered an opinion, or for a page in which you have a vested interest (i.e. a page that you have edited heavily).
and you clearly offered an opinion. SportingFlyer T·C 17:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
AFDs
Hello, ArcAngel,
Thank you for relisting AFD discussions when they are unresolved and it is appropriate to do so. Lately, there have been fewer participants and patrolling admins going through AFD discussions (summer vacations?) and I get concerned when I'm the only editor who is doing the relisting. It's nice to see other editors like you and CycloneYoris helping out. Thank you for your contributions. Liz Read! Talk! 00:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the kind words. I try to do what I can. :-) ArcAngel (talk) 02:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, ArcAngel,
FYI, you draftified this article because you state it had been declined at AFC but I looked at the page history and didn't see that it had ever been declined. In fact there is an edit summary that states it "completed AFC". And even if it had been declined by an AFC reviewer, the page creator can still move it to main space (although it's not advised) unless there is a COI or paid editing involved or the article had been previously deleted at an AFD. It's recommended that editors use AFC but that is just so they are given ample time to work on an article and make it unlikely it will be tagged for deletion...but AFC is not mandatory for anyone but paid editors. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry if I caused any undue workload. I am trying to get more involved and thought that I would try clearing the backlog at Category:AfC_topic_used_in_wrong_namespace. Apparently I still have a lot of Wiki-learning to do. ArcAngel (talk) 04:43, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Thank you for your concern about that film. However there is a strong consensus that a film with 2 reviews may be considered rather notable, specially when it received other coverage (such as the article in The Hindu). I mentioned this in a precedent edit summary. I am therefore removing the tag(s) again. Should you disagree, feel free to take the page to Deletion discussion. Thank you. Also please note, as another user has mentioned on another page, that one notability tag is enough. Thank you. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Strong consensus from who? ArcAngel (talk) 20:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)