User talk:Bluerasberry/Archive 36
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 30 | ← | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | → | Archive 40 |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:38, 18 April 2017 (UTC)WT:Harassment
Hi, Bluerasberry. I undid you revert. Jytdog posted a link on March 15, right below GorillaWarfare's statement to the archived statement. Its still there. Generally speaking, it's much better to do that rather than alter someone else's comment. Mkdw talk 01:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- I will leave it but it seems strange to preserve a dead link. I recognize that it is in the old comment but it seems apparent to me that the person was trying to communicate a link, not code which is cannot have meaning outside the context of further research which only a few people can do. I appreciate your intent to protect the text, though. Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Bill Potts
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bill Potts. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Veronica Lake
I left you a message at Talk:Veronica Lake. That whole Stewart Lake nonsense is a hoax. Veronica Lake's life is pretty well documented, and she published her autobiography in 1970. No one named Stewart Lake was a part of that. The whole thing is a fabrication. She was given the name Veronica Lake by a producer at the beginning of her career, and it's a pretty well-known fact. Please close out that hoax. — Maile (talk) 00:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- I replied on the talk page there. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:36, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
- please help translate this message into your local language via meta
|
The 2016 Cure Award |
| In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. |
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Art+Feminism, Saturday, May 6, at Jacob Lawrence Gallery, UW Seattle
Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Despite its wide reach, content on Wikipedia suffers from the bias of its editors: white, technically inclined, English-speaking men that live in developed, majority-Christian countries. This represents an alarming absence of voices in an increasingly important repository of shared knowledge. In an effort to change this, the Jake is organizing a Wikipedia Edit-a-thon on Saturday, May 6th, 1 - 5 pm. Our mission is to bring together diverse communities to participate in Wikipedia editing, and improve its coverage of queer people and women of color in the arts. We will provide childcare, snacks, and tutorials for the beginner editor. Bring your laptop, power-cord and ideas for entries that need updating or creation. No previous Wikipedia experience required! RSVP at and stay tuned to our Facebook page for updates. What: Improving Wikipedia's coverage on queer and women artists of color -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 4 May 2017 (UTC) |
Drug expiration
Thanks for jumping in to the draft of drug expiration. It was a crazy article to address because it is a mix of technical medical content plus practical consumer information. I was struggling with the wording for the distinction between actual expiration date versus date on the label, so thanks for rewording that. I kept all of your changes. Thanks also for setting up the talk page.
The article is live now. I do not know how you found it while it was in draft form but I appreciate your attention. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC) |}
- Thanks for your message! I was glad to help copyedit a bit. I found the draft when I looked at your contributions list. The WP:POPUPS gadget is old but still works fine. It lets you preview any user's recent contributions just by moving your mouse around — without any clicking required.
- The article looks good; thanks again for writing it. Drug expiration is a big money-maker for drug makers. :) It's a sensible thing for you and/or the rest of Consumers Union to write about. Upon seeing the article, I was intrigued to learn about drug recycling. I may one day be starting on a certain rather-expensive drug, and may eventually look into acquiring it through recycling instead of just shopping around and using GoodRx.com for a coupon code.
- My only quibble about the article: It strikes me as a bit odd that it has an empty "External links" section. I looked at MOS:ORDER s.v. "Bottom matter" and WP:LAYOUTEL s.v. "single item". It looks to me like (if you have no external links) it's best to omit the section, and to put all your category tags in the "References" instead.
- Thanks also for all your work on Wikipedia. The more unbiased paid editors we have working on WikiProject Medicine, the better.
- You need not write back to me unless you so desire. If you do write back, please do first move the whole conversation back to my talk page.
- —Unforgettableid (talk) 18:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Meetup Invitation
You are invited to the upcoming Asian Pacific American Heritage month edit-athon.
This will be held on the first floor of the Knight library at the University of Oregon.
For more information please see: Wikipedia:Meetup/Eugene/WikiAPA, a Facebook event link is also available on the Meetup page.
- Date: Friday, May 26, 2017
- Time: 12:00 pm – 4:00 pm
- Location: Edminston Classroom, Knight Library, Room 144
- Address:1501 Kincaid Street, Eugene, Oregon, 97403-1299
Hope to see you there!
- (This message was sent to WikiProject members via Wikipedia:Meetup/Eugene/WikiAPA/MailingList on 23:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC). To opt-out of future messages please remove your name from the mailing list.)
We're on Twitter!
| WikiLGBT is on Twitter! | |
|---|---|
 |
|
Sunday May 21: Metropolitan Museum of Art Edit-a-thon + global online challenge
| Sunday May 21, 10:30 am - 4:30pm: Metropolitan Museum of Art Edit-a-thon | |
|---|---|
 The Metropolitan Museum of Art Edit-a-thon: Met Open Access Initiative is the Metropolitan Museum of Art's first edit-a-thon, being hosted on Sunday May 21, 2017 in Thomas J. Watson Library at The Met Fifth Avenue in New York City. The Met is excited to make available over 375,000 images of public domain artworks for contribution to Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons from the museum’s collection spanning 5,000 years of art. The event is an opportunity for Wikimedia communities to engage The Met's diverse collection onsite and remotely. The event is a key marker too of The Metropolitan Museum of Art's first Wikimedian-in-Residence program, with resident Richard Knipel (User:Pharos), along with Wikimedia NYC. We invite you to help enhance Wikimedia communities and platforms with open access images from The Metropolitan Museum of Art. The event requires pre-registration. To register, 1) please sign-up with Eventbrite via The Met's website and 2) add your Wikipedia username to the #Participants on the wikimeetup page. Please check-in with museum staff when you arrive at the Thomas J. Watson Library within the museum. We also welcome remote participation for the global Met Open Access Artworks Challenge (15 May - 30 June, 2017), you can sign up there at Met Open Access Artworks Challenge/Participants. --Pharos (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC) | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
| Wednesday May 24, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan. Topics this month include the TED wikiproject, the Met wikiproject, and encouraging free video on Wikimedia Commons! We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities. We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 19:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
NPR
Hello Bluerasberry. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.
- URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
- Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
- Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
- Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
your blueness open access project tagging
I seem to have encountered a plethora of open/open access in a range of new articles concerning the open/open access subject - and as a project tagger, I am quite concerned to get it right... so to speak - there is open project and there is open access - are they concomitant - that is they are equal bed fellows - and can be both tagged against an article relative to open access - or does one trump the other as a single entry sufficient? - or is there more to the issue of having two projects with such similar names, and requires further tweaking when tagging an article - any clues appreciated JarrahTree 10:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- I replied on your talk page. I appreciate this question. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your reply. I think it looks like we will have an opportunity to talk about the issues soon... JarrahTree 14:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia Edit-a-thon Inquiry
Good morning Lane,
I took your course for WNYLRC in March and have since become interested in Project Medicine. So much so, that I am traveling to Montreal this August to attend the Project Medicine day at WikiMania. I really want to promote this project to students and faculty as a means of demonstrating how we are all contributors to the information landscape (not just consumers). Unfortunately, my personal/professional priorities have largely trumped my small goal to make one edit a day (but I hope to get back on that now that summer is on its way and I have a little more time each day).
I was wondering whether you might be able to point me to some resources/people/links that could help me plan a Wikipedia editing event during Open Access Week this October. I am a health sciences librarian at McMaster University in Canada. I think it would be interesting to invite faculty and students alike to learn how they can edit health articles on wikipedia and get some practice. I'd like to prepare a proposal for this event so I need to have a framework in place before I get the green light to move forward planning. I would greatly appreciate any guidance you could provide me with as I have absolutely no experience with this kind of thing!
Thanks very much! --Mcbrarian (talk) 17:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)