User talk:Fostera12
My Significant contributions to wikipedia have been
- Meher Baba Filmography
- International Film Festival of India
- Indian Winners and nominees of the Golden Globe Awards
- Indian Winners and nominees at the Cannes Film Festival
- Media Wave International Film Festival
- Cinema of India
- Telugu cinema
Reliable review
Since the film is notable, please add the review of Sarigamalu from the Zamin Ryot archives. Also wondering why you keep including this source, which is not about the film "Sarigamalu". DareshMohan (talk) 08:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes will add this, pls share zaminryot pdf link, I could not find it, and change the other source Fostera12 (talk) 09:29, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- First look for the year 1993 or 1994. Since the film released on 27 November 1993, I searched the December 1993 archives but could not find it. DareshMohan (talk) 20:39, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Sure will do it Fostera12 (talk) 07:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- First look for the year 1993 or 1994. Since the film released on 27 November 1993, I searched the December 1993 archives but could not find it. DareshMohan (talk) 20:39, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
There is mention about Rambha in the film here - http://www.zaminryot.com/pdf/1993/Dec/3-dec-1993.pdf pls check, added now as ref 2 in the article Sarigamalu.Fostera12 (talk) 08:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- First of all, I wanted to say thank you for your edits. I am sorry for anything done in the past. DareshMohan (talk) 02:25, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
- So S. S. Rajamouli worked with him for only one film? DareshMohan (talk) 03:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Need to check in title credits or imdb of kranthi kumar filmography Fostera12 (talk) 09:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
What does the title of the review on page 11 say? Can you add it if you can read Telugu? Kailash29792 (talk) 13:30, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Title - "Neti Savitiri fails to reflect the personality of today's woman". The review says that the film has disappointed the women audience, and the subject is not reflecting the actual society. In addition, there are no crowd pleasing elements suitable to Telugu audiences, as the director tried to imitate Tamil nativity in some of the scenes. The director went overboard by creating situations like throwing the thali inside the temple. Overall, the movie was bad.Fostera12 (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the translation. What I want is, the title of the review in Telugu script so I can paste it into the ref. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Okay. Hope this works.Fostera12 (talk) 15:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Need help
Hi, I need some help. Can you please comment on this thread supporting the move from Venkateshvara to Venkateswara? The original name was Venkateswara which is how most South Indian deity names are spelled in English. However, some people have prematurely moved the page to a very non-standard and uncommon spelling of Venkateshvara as per North Indian usage. Can you please comment in that thread and explain that the spelling Venakteswara is the most used spelling in academic as well as in official sources? Reo kwon (talk) 18:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Doug Weller talk 17:47, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited M. Visvesvaraya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, Fostera12,
- If an article gets nominated for an AFD deletion discussion, do not make major changes to the article, changing the entire subject and then move it to a different page title. If you want an article on this other subject, then write a new article, do not "hijack" an existing article. It won't change the course of the AFD discussion and it is just disruptive editing. Feel free to participate in the AFD discussion to make your arguments for what you want to happen with this article. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Fostera12. Thank you for your work on The Awakener (film). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Fostera12. Thank you for your work on Sufism Reoriented Sanctuary. Broc, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. I marked two minor issues on the page.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Broc (talk) 07:04, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Fostera12! Your additions to Perfect Master (Meher Baba) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 10:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
What you are bothering me about copyright is actually mirroring of wikipedia. It is wikipedia's content copies by the website. Not the other way. Fostera12 (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not a mirror, but the blog did copy the article. A mirror would include many actual articles fully copied. Article is now move protected. Doug Weller talk 12:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Meher Baba
Hi. I appreciate your efforts to improve content about Meher Baba. However, you're also causing disruption in that area. Could you please slow down and focus on one thing, perhaps content to start with, and then determine at a later time in the future if these topics warrant a page move by vacating an existing page and the desired location? Also, if you copy from elsewhere, you must attribute it. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources. Please attribute it in the edit summaries so others would know what is happening and would help in not raising false alarms. I hope you heed to this advice. Thanks! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 12:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 13:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Check talk page of article. Till admin intervenes, I will remove because this is your deliberate nonsense on well sourced article, since 2020 lot has changed in those awards.Fostera12 (talk) 13:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't do that. Please see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, where it explains that the creator of a page may not remove the deletion tag from it. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 13:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- pls dont message me again. That is different case not similar.Fostera12 (talk) 13:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't do that. Please see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, where it explains that the creator of a page may not remove the deletion tag from it. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 13:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Dadasaheb Phalke International Film Festival, you may be blocked from editing. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- You first protect the article Fostera12 (talk) 13:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- You can explain why the article should not be deleted on the talk page. Kindly assume good faith toward others. Thanks for your consideration. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- It wont work that way, I have already contested in articles talk page. So, without assuming good faith anyone can throw speedy deletion on any article? Fostera12 (talk) 13:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Take a moment to step back. Administrators will thoroughly review all aspects of the article before making a decision on its deletion. You should focus more on improving it and to explain how it differs from the deleted version. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 14:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- I already stepped back, as you have lobbied enough adding notes etc, there is no fair use approach here. Admins dont have time to thoroughly review. If that is the case, you remove that note? why are you lobbying with admin and projecting your decision on creation protection? dont say all this non sense to me. Fostera12 (talk) 14:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Where should I explain in article talk page no body is replying in it. No body cares. Fostera12 (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- I already stepped back, as you have lobbied enough adding notes etc, there is no fair use approach here. Admins dont have time to thoroughly review. If that is the case, you remove that note? why are you lobbying with admin and projecting your decision on creation protection? dont say all this non sense to me. Fostera12 (talk) 14:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Take a moment to step back. Administrators will thoroughly review all aspects of the article before making a decision on its deletion. You should focus more on improving it and to explain how it differs from the deleted version. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 14:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- It wont work that way, I have already contested in articles talk page. So, without assuming good faith anyone can throw speedy deletion on any article? Fostera12 (talk) 13:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- You can explain why the article should not be deleted on the talk page. Kindly assume good faith toward others. Thanks for your consideration. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
The article is expertly sourced. Nothing to improve.
Final warning
You have long had this habit of harassing people you don't agree with on here and placing gratuitous warning templates without understanding your own problematic behavior. If this continues then your editing privileges will be revoked. 13:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC) —SpacemanSpiff 13:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay. I will stop, pls do the needful from your end. You stop harassing me unnecessarily. This much aversion not required. You can convey your message assuming good faith.Fostera12 (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)