[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

User talk:Garuda3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Littledrummrboy (talk | contribs) at 18:33, 12 October 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Appreciation for a warm welcome!

NemesisAT, I appreciate the welcome message you left on my talk page a month ago. I recently read the Wikipedia guidelines page entitled "Please do not bite the newcomers" and wanted to give you kudos for exemplifying the ideals discussed on that page. I also wanted to try out the quadruple-tilda signature that your post, as well as welcome posts all over the site, reminds new users to use. Thanks for the welcome!

— Scholascarlata (talk) 03:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Starting on Wikia (now called Fandom) before I started on Wikipedia probably helped me get used to things like signing posts, as it isn't always intuitive. I personally reccommend going into the "Beta" menu at the top of the page (on desktop) and enabling "Discussion tools", it makes it easier to reply to any comment on a talk page, and is what I'm using to reply to you now. No signatures required! You can always leave me a message if you think I can help with something, though there's also the Wikipedia:Teahouse if you'd like to ask a wider range of people. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 16:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak content

The weak content was removed in the Pokémon articles expressly because the content was there to justify the article's merit, merely by making the Reception look bigger than it actually was. I would have redirected the first one too, I was merely deleting the content to see how much reception actual content the Reception section had. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 00:48, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message. I'll be honest, I'm not sure why you feel content like the Official Nintendo Magazine should be removed. But my main objection was to redirecting, nothing personal, I just feel there should always be discussion before that happens. As AfD discussions are now taking place, I'll keep my nose out and let others decide. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 16:24, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Santhosh Damodharan has been accepted

Santhosh Damodharan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Thanks for this edit here [1] [2], without it the article wouldn't be in AfD as of now and would be gone, eventually it saved Lapras. 180.194.128.118 (talk) 23:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thank you for your message. NemesisAT (talk) 23:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Control copyright icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cruis'n Blast, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.mobygames.com/game/cruisn-blast, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Cruis'n Blast saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! JBchrch talk 10:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @JBchrch:, I restored someone else's edit as it had been re-phrased since the copyright violating edit earlier on. I was under the impression that re-writing in your own words resolves the copyright issue. Could you please clarify? Thanks NemesisAT (talk) 10:26, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @NemesisAT: Earwig's copyvio tool detected what I considered to be close paraphrasing of https://www.mobygames.com/game/cruisn-blast. In other words, some text in the article was extremely similar to this website, with only a few words changed or swapped, and the structure of the sentences and the paragraphs remaining the same. The article has been added to the Copyright problems log so that specialized editors will take a look. I hope this clarifies. JBchrch talk 11:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help, @JBchrch:. I can re-write it again which would hopefully resolve the issue, or am I best to leave it for just now? I do think the article should be kept, which was the primary reason for me restoring the content. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@NemesisAT: Maybe let's just leave it now to see what the community thinks. The worst that can happen is that the section in question gets deleted and revdeled, but the article should remain on the mainspace. JBchrch talk 17:43, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I only noticed after writing that comment that the template placed on the article asks for the content not to be edited. NemesisAT (talk) 17:44, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@NemesisAT: You have probably seen this on your watchlist, but the article has been cleaned of any copyright infringement. You may rewrite the WP:REVDELed sections, but please please be careful of close paraphrasing. Thank you and cheers. JBchrch talk 19:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @JBchrch: for the message. I will be more careful in the future. NemesisAT (talk) 19:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cityrider 56 has been accepted

Cityrider 56, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Platform 1 has been accepted

Platform 1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 13:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: M41 (Durban) (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Locomotive207 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 02:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

prod

Hi, I note that you removed the PROD for Arthur Tyde. Can I please ask you what your rationale is? The concerns are:

  • the article doesn't assert the notability of the subject
  • the references given don't seem to show *proper* coverage in *independent* *reliable* sources
  • the article serves as a linkfarm for various companies

Thank you, Dr. Vogel (talk) 19:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I generally favour keeping articles rather than deleting them as we have practically infinite space here on Wikipedia. While I agree the article is problematic (no inline references for a start), I feel the Wired and Linux Magazine sources are enough that notability could be established and as such I didn't want to see this one be deleted without further discussion and analysis. The other links appear to be promotional, but this is okay IMO as long as we have some secondary sourcing, and they can always be removed or replaced with secondary sources in the future. You are always welcome to nominate the article for deletion if you still wish. An easy way to do this is with Twinkle, and under the "TW" dropdown selecting "XFD". Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 20:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sick Wid It Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sick Wid It Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sick Wid It Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Yappy2bhere (talk) 20:13, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jempson's has been accepted

Jempson's, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bogger (talk) 12:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendover Dean Viaduct has been accepted

Wendover Dean Viaduct, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, how are you? It has been reopened for discussion, I would appreciate it if you could express your opinion again. :) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berkay Çatak --𝘋𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘴 ϟ Heyyo? 09:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Dicayes: thanks for your message, I'm good thanks. While I would be happy to add another comment, my understanding is there should be only one vote per person so you should change the second "keep" to a "comment" instead. While you can make as many comments as you like, there is no requirement to do so after a relisting. Right now, the article hasn't changed since I last edited it, so there isn't anything new for me to comment on. However, if you are able to expand the article more please do so and leave me a message, and I'll take another look. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Line 16 (Guangzhou Metro) has been accepted

Line 16 (Guangzhou Metro), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AntanO 16:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tony Clay has been accepted

Tony Clay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Changsha–Ganzhou high-speed railway (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
First, let's wait until the railway is completed. Second, let's find sources other than those controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chris Troutman (talk) 15:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KC Lights (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tame (talk) 08:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Comet (bus service) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Comet (bus service). Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comet (bus service) has been accepted

Comet (bus service), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The 8-Bit Guy (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is borderline notable. Are there any more sources that cover this person in detail that aren't interviews or passing mentions?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:32, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Worswick Street bus station has been accepted

Worswick Street bus station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The 8-Bit Guy (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
History section need to be written. It reads like an essay than encyclopaedic article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 01:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heckmondwike bus station has been accepted

Heckmondwike bus station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:32, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plymouth coach station has been accepted

Plymouth coach station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:19, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bretonside bus station has been accepted

Bretonside bus station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arle Court park and ride (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arle Court park and ride (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is just local news WP:GEOSCOPE
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:52, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Campaign Against Genocide Museum has been accepted

Campaign Against Genocide Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:12, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The 8-Bit Guy has been accepted

The 8-Bit Guy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Clearfrienda 💬 11:17, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PROD removal

FYI, this PROD you removed has perfectly acceptable grounds - not playing professionally means a player fails NFOOTBALL and is non-notable. Now we'll have to take to AFD where deletion is inevitable. GiantSnowman 19:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ormskirk bus station has been accepted

Ormskirk bus station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chester Bus Interchange has been accepted

Chester Bus Interchange, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Friendship

Hey NemesisAT, Nice to meet you NemesisAT. I'm from Sri Lanka.--Abhilasha Will (talk) 03:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Abhilasha Will, nice to meet you too. Greetings from the UK. NemesisAT (talk) 15:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I hope to have a friendship with you, Can I call you NemesisAT.--Abhilasha Will (talk) 01:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, let me know if I can help you with anything. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 19:46, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sakura Cherry Tree Project has been accepted

Sakura Cherry Tree Project, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ASUKITE 15:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikihounding

Hi. Please desist the wikihounding you've been engaged in for the last month or so, as I've asked you in the past. It's getting very old. Onel5969 TT me 02:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Onel5969 I'm sorry if my edits here bother you but I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. You've asked me once in an edit summary, which I replied to in a subsequent edit, and at that point I still wasn't sure what I was doing wrong. I have declined PRODs, restored articles from redirects and commented on deletion discussions by various users, not just yourself. I believe all of these actions are in according with Wikipedia's guidelines. I am not picking on you, and am sorry if it feels that way. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 07:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NemesisAT, since we had a disagreement a couple of months ago, you're interacting with many of my edits, in a way that could only be done if your following my edit history. If you do not stop, I'll be forced to take further. Sorry it's come to this. I've tried to ignore it, asked you to stop before, and you continue. I won't belabor the point, so please stop. Onel5969 TT me 12:30, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I remember we disagreed about something, though I can't remember what it was. But what really got me into deletion discussions was a post on WikiProject Trains raising awareness of some bus-related AfDs. Since then, I've become a lot more active in this side of Wikipedia as I have tried to reduce the amount of content getting deleted. I will not follow your edits, but I will continue to monitor new redirects (via the tag), AfD discussions, and proposed deletions so we may find ourselves editing the same pages in the future. Once again, sorry about any stress I caused with my edits. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 16:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PRODs

Please check the article and its sources before declining a PROD. It's pretty clear that carhop service is not unique in the U.S., based on a simple minute of searching. SounderBruce 22:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruce, my edit summary was supposed to imply that I wasn't sure if the claim was true. Sorry if this wasn't clear. Anyway, I felt this article would be better discussed at AfD rather than deleted by PROD, on the basis that the restaurant (or type of restaurant) may be notable. We do not have this sort of restaurant in the UK, so it's not a subject I'm familiar with. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 22:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help for the novice editor

Hi NemesisAT, Can you please advise me on editing Cyber-Complex Foundation? Doesn't it look too "promotional"? How can it possibly be modified and what to include additionally? Thanks a lot :) JinLon (talk) 19:19, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, to be honest, I'm not sure. I thought the article was fine, which was why I removed the PROD notice. I think you just need to find additional references for it to allow it to pass WP:GNG. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 19:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Webster Avenue Bridge

Notice

The article Webster Avenue Bridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a random bridge over a train line, and is not notable in any way. This is not a major bridge over a river, or one that is architecturally significant. We can't have articles for every bridge over a train line in an encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 12:57, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mossend EuroTerminal (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:33, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, NemesisAT! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:33, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mossend EuroTerminal (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:35, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Q School

Hi! I see you've reverted the redirect of the 2019 Q School - event 2. Please see the talk at WT:SNOOKER, where there was some consensus that these events weren't independently notable, and that they would be better suited covered by an article covering all three events (see 2019 Q School (snooker)). Happy to take to AfD, but a merge for all three events, but I think it's unlikely they meet GNG on their own. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:37, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

​I came here to advise that notable people taking part in an event doesn't make the event notable. However, seeing a conversation has started... Merging all three event articles into 2019 Q School (snooker) would lead to either an unwieldly article or a lot of information being lost to keep the article manageable. Looking at it another way, if the sub-pages didn't exist and all the information was contained in 2019 Q School (snooker), then there would probably be calls for the article to be split.
This does actually raise a bigger question about coverage of sports. How much depth should we be giving to tournaments? Do we give in-depth coverage, which means sub-pages to keep the main page from being unwieldy, or do we just summarise on a single page? Looking at tennis, we have multiple sub-pages for each tournament, men's singles, ladies' singles etc. Virtually all of these pages fail the requirement should have well-sourced prose, not merely a list of stats of WP:SPORTSEVENT. A lot have a simple XXXX is the defending champion for the lead, not even mentioning tennis on the page. I think this needs a bigger conversation than the notability of individual sub-pages of a single event. We need to be establishing a consistent approach for events in all sports. This also needs to be a community wide discussions, leaving it solely to individual projects would probably end up in wild inconsistencies such as we have with the SNGs for sportspeople. --John B123 (talk) 22:58, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
These pages have been merged. The draws to the individual events, which are the only thing that are on each subpage, aren't exactly important. It's pretty simple for how we should treat this - does the event have enough coverage to meet GNG? If not, the info on who won etc should be merged across. See 2019 Challenge Tour where I've done the same thing. We should totally not just be a place to replicate brackets from other events. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 06:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know if you would rather I took them to AFD, but I think redirecting is a much better use, and likely the outcome of any discussion. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 06:16, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks for your message. I'm not familiar with snooker myself but I feel it would be a shame to lose the information on the individual event pages. I see 2019 Q School (snooker) has some prose, could the diagrams be copied into that page as well? My reversion of redirects was not a personal thing at all, I have just realised a lot of content is being redirected without any wider discussion. As it appears this has been discussed in this case (and in your message here), I'm not too fussed whether the pages are merged or kept separate. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The draw, (or brackets), are simply copied from [3]. For events where the individual tournaments don't meet GNG, we generally merge them into one article, covering who won, and any other info. I've done my best to make the 2019 Q School article as a point to merge these, similarly as to how I handled the 2019–20 Challenge Tour. Whilst we could have a long list of the results, these aren't professional tournaments, so aren't particularly important. I'm going to revert back to these being a redirect for now, as we did have a conversation at WT:SNOOKER. Feel free to comment there if there's anything further. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KC Lights (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 03:39, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: McGinty’s Group (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Iamfarzan were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Iamfarzan (talk) 06:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Palmer (author) (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from WhoAteMyButter

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LivHOME. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk│📝contribs) 02:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this NemesisAT (talk) 15:39, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfD weapon

I don't think this [4] make sense. Why people are using AfD is a weapon?

Please see my vote on that discussion. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 15:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Onel5969 TT me 02:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hold your horse is (band)

Hi, I saw you reverted the PROD tag on Hold Your Horse Is (band), saying "Decline PROD, somethign [sic] else having the same name isn't grounds for deletion". For reference, here is what I wrote originally: "This band doesn't meet notability guidelines for music. The article was started and largely written by the band itself. Anybody searching Wikipedia for "Hold Your Horse Is" would most likely be looking for the Hella album." It is possible the band does meet notability guidelines. But a good faith response would've still been preferable. Violarulez (talk) 04:42, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't write a full enough response. I didnt think the nomination was in bad faith, I just thought it was an odd rationale for deletion. I generally decline PRODs if there is any chance a subject may be notable, so please don't take it personally. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 08:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have no past experience nominating articles for deletion, but I have a hard time believing that lack of notability and largely being written by the subject itself is an odd rationale. so... I don't take it personally, but I think there is a misreading or miscommunication going on. I will try renominating at some point, and remove the third sentence to avoid confusion. As well as spelling out why I don't think they are notable. Violarulez (talk) 00:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tilhar railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tilhar railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilhar railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

07:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Deletion review for PROIV

An editor has asked for a deletion review of PROIV. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. (Note this regarding an XfD that was raised almost immediately the one you participated in for the same article) Djm-leighpark (talk) 14:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I completely missed the second deletion discussion. Thank you for the notification. NemesisAT (talk) 15:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NemesisAT

Thank you for creating Mick McGinty.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs an infobox with an image.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) 

scope_creepTalk 21:16, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Palmer (author) (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The draft has not been significantly approved since it was last declined. Please attempt to fix the problems before resubmitting it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Salimfadhley (talk) 23:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undo

Please never undo my edit when I prod something. I improved the article in the same edit as the prod. You remove the prod manually. Geschichte (talk) 12:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry I missed your changes. I've had a different user complain because I undid their prods manually and didn't use the undo button. NemesisAT (talk) 12:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BOYZ (Jesy Nelson song) (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not enough coverage to meet WP:NSONG.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 14:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Keep up the good work on transportation articles! Seasider53 (talk) 05:33, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! And well done on your tireless work on Scottish articles NemesisAT (talk) 09:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see you took a day off yesterday. Generally this is not permitted. ;) Seasider53 (talk) 12:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Occasionally life gets in the way... I have to be careful sometimes not to let Wikipedia get in the way of everything else! NemesisAT (talk) 19:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Zhangshu East railway station

Hello, NemesisAT,

Thank you for creating Zhangshu East railway station.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

* This article does not have sufficient references.

  • References about the this railway station and district served are necessary. Timetables of individual rail services are insufficient and do not confer notability. Kindly do the needful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Xinfeng railway station (Jiangxi)

Hello, NemesisAT,

Thank you for creating Xinfeng railway station (Jiangxi).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

* This article does not have sufficient references.

  • References about the this railway station and district served are necessary. Timetables of individual rail services are insufficient and do not confer notability. Kindly do the needful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Story moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sarah Story, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 11:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zhangshu East railway station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zhangshu East railway station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 11:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Xinfeng railway station (Jiangxi) moved to draftspace. Insufficiently sourced.

An article you recently created, Xinfeng railway station (Jiangxi), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 11:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drum Corps

Thanks for the heads up - I'll be on the look out. I caught both Troopers and Pac Crest because I had started them, but I'll go check out the others. Littledrummrboy (talk) 18:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Garuda3&oldid=1049593910"