[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User talk:Historianism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Historianism (talk | contribs) at 02:55, 18 April 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello Historianism! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 01:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous


Daily Mail

Hi Historianism. Thanks very much for your kind comments. The Daily Mail is what we call in England a tabloid newspaper, i.e. its orientation is popular rather than serious. Its politics are firmly to the right and it is considered non-mainstream on issues related to ethnic minorities. Some people quote the fact that the paper supported Hitler in the 1930s but of course it has been under several editorships since then. The serious papers in the UK, which are always reliable sources in WP terms, are The Times (centre right), the Daily Telegraph (right), The Independent (centre), The Guardian (centre left) and the Financial Times (centre). In this particular case the Daily Mail's reporting was obviously shoddy. It said that Sir Ian Blair had "revealed" the existence of forced conversions, yet it did not cite any of his actual words, and the statement the police eventually issued did not bear out the Mail's version at all. Itsmejudith 21:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Judith, Thanks for your reply, IMHO: The Guardian is far lefty biased, The Independent as "center"? all I see is Jihadists or those apologizing for Jihadists quoting 'The Independemt' in demonizing US, Israel on forums, I heard much too humuor about the "title" that never suit them. As to the Daily Mail being connected to Hitler, I am pretty sure that most anti - daily mail do not include it in their political agenda. As to them being a tabloid-paper, I can not disagree with that, in many cases. Historianism 10:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Bechri

Mohamed Bechri is professor of economics at the University of Sousse, Tunisia. He holds a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Southern California. [1] [2].

Human rights activism

He's a renowned human rights activist and former chair of the Tunisian section of Amnesty International [3], Human Rights Watch cites him in telling of repression of human rights. [4]

Statements

This progressive professor is quoted of blaming the Arab silence of Darfur genocide on the "twin fascisms" that dominates the Middle East, pan-Arabism and Islamism [5], as well as to why all minorities living within the Arab world are under siege. [6] and that 'Islamism is the mother of all big lies.'[7]

Persecuted

In 2000. Journalist were assaulted and threatened by police officers in Tunis. among them were Omar Mestiri and Mohammed Bechri, both human rights activists [8], professor Bechri told Human Rights Watch that he was forcibly prevented from approaching the Ministry and was attacked in his car as he was trying to leave.[9].


Historianism (talk) 02:55, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]