User talk:Kanto7

July 2020

Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I noticed that you recently removed content from Allied Military Government for Occupied Territories without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Blablubbs (talk) 11:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Allies Military Government was not a geopolitical organisation. It was a country. Could you please add imfobpx country and remove infobox geopolitical organisation. Thanks Kanto7 (talk) 11:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Kanto7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page British Raj did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. regentspark (comment) 13:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kanto7: You might want to review some of the links in the welcome post above. In particular, do read up on WP:Verifiability and Reliable sourcing. Always a good idea to review the norms of a community you are joining. --regentspark (comment) 13:36, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm Vif12vf. I noticed that you recently removed content from Basutoland without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits like this are considered vandalism. Please refrain from making them. Wikiacc (¶) 23:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

British India

"India" (during the period 1858 to 1947) = British Raj = British India + Princely states. Please read about it in the British Raj page. Best regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 22:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And be careful, your edits are always reverted and edit warring without discussing is not encouraged. Please use the talk page and engage other editors otherwise it is likely that a case will be put forward for you to be topic banned -----Snowded ^TALK 04:55, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Niger Districts moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Niger Districts, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 05:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

You're still adding flags to articles. Please stop.--RegentsPark (comment) 14:25, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi Kanto7. I perused your edit history and noticed that you never seem to have added a reference to an article, despite making many edits. Are you perhaps unaware of the reliable sourcing policy on Wikipedia? Or, perhaps, you just don't know how to add sources? If you need help in understanding what it means for something to be sourced, or help in how to add sources, you can get help from the WP:TEAHOUSE. Regardless, please note that we have a strong policy on WP:Verifiability and running foul of policies is not a good long term strategy on Wikipedia. Best wishes. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at British Raj. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 02:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tangier International Zone

Hello. Welcome to Wikipedia, unfortunately one or more of your recent contributions to Tangier International Zone has been reverted. Even though I’m sure this edit was made in good-faith, it removed content without adequate explanation. Consider opening debate on the article’s talk page. A copy of your edit is available on the article’s edit history. For more general advice on editing see the Contributing to Wikipedia page.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

AussieWikiDan (talk) 04:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nauru not part of the Gilbert Islands

Hi. I do understand why you added the Mandate of Nauru to the Japanese occupation of the Gilbert Islands, but the Japanese occupation of Nauru is its own history — related to Ocean Island occupation. Nauru was put together by Japanese forces but was never part of the Gilbert Islands, so it sounds awkward to put it there. Yours -Arorae (talk) 04:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Your low grade edit warring on British Raj is getting to be problematic. Please stop it or a case may have to be made to topic ban you -----Snowded ^TALK 06:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at British Raj. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 03:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting loose patience here and you don't seem to be listening. If you revert again without consensus or carry on with edits which are a form of vandalism then I am going to make the case for a topic ban. Read WP:BRD please -----Snowded ^TALK 05:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

formal warning

Your recent editing history at British Raj shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

A slow edit war is still an edit war. This warning is a requirement before requesting sanctions so I suggest you take it as a chance to stop your disruptive behaviour. -----Snowded ^TALK 05:18, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arab-Byzantine Condominium moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Arab-Byzantine Condominium, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 23:12, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Danish Iceland

The article Danish Iceland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references given to support what is a personal essay by an editor with a history of edit warring and disruption (see British Raj)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---Snowded ^TALK 09:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you move this into a sand pit and focus on getting references into it and some evidence of notability -----Snowded ^TALK 09:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on Proposed deletion

I posted the following on the talk page for the Danish Iceland article but sharing here as well.

The main issues with this article include:

1. Sources --- There aren't any and that is a huge issue.

2. Appropriateness of a separate article --- It seems like much of this content might better fit under either the articles for History of Iceland or Danish overseas colonies, but if you think it merits a separate article it would be good to have an argument that would justify it.

One last thought for you... I think it might be best to consider taking this article into a draft status (see Wikipedia:Drafts for more information on this), if you want to try to improve this article and keep it alive, but won't be able to get it up to the standards fast enough.

Good luck and please let me know if you have any questions. Jmbranum (talk) 14:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

Please remember to identify the source of the material in your edit when copying within Wikipedia.

I think you copied material from History of Iceland, which is permitted but it must be properly attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. For future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding a link to the source and the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved. It is not too late to add the attribution. See Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Repairing_insufficient_attribution which explains how to do so.S Philbrick (Talk) 12:18, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Danish Iceland

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Danish Iceland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://lifewellnessazores.com/journal/399bed-who-discovered-iceland and http://mycakrawala.com/journal/7adaab-vikings-in-iceland. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Faizal batliwala (talk) 15:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bechuanaland Protectorate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Mackenzie. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colony of Trinidad and Tobago moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Colony of Trinidad and Tobago, does not have sources and citations and cannot as written remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Just to add also that IMO this topic is unlikely to warrant its own article, and the contents could/should probably be incorporated eg. into History of Trinidad and Tobago. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Colony of Trinidad and Tobago (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia contains the srticles Trinidad and Tobago and History of Trinidad and Tobago any additional information in this submission could probably be included in one or both of those articles. This submission does not appear worthy of a standalone item and has no references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Colony of Trinidad and Tobago and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Colony of Trinidad and Tobago, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 03:41, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kanto7! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 03:41, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colony of Tuvalu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Colony of Tuvalu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Amkgp 💬 04:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changing flags all over

At this point we are going to need you to propose any flag changes on talk page before implantation. Changing flags all over that have been stable for years and in many cases talked about needs discussion. --Moxy 🍁 01:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The Aden Protectorate, like the other British protectorates and protected states of the Arabian Peninsula and Persian Gulf states had their own flags, so please stop uploading the British Union Jack flag as the flag of the Aden Protectorate, it was not. --Lubiesque (talk) 12:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Moxy 🍁 04:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Before being blocked for not communicating with others let's see you post here.--Moxy 🍁 01:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Moxy 🍁 01:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look can you please tell me why Kanto7 (talk) 01:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm communicating. I don't understand why you are reverting edits that are correct? Kanto7 (talk) 01:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great to see you taking.....as seen above many edits you have done are contsted. Pls review WP:BRD....TO put it simply if you are reverted you need to talk about the changes on the articles talk page. One example of an edit that is contested is adding the HBC flag all over....3 editors above have raised concers....as with changing territory dates.--Moxy 🍁 01:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But when did I add the Hudson Bay Company flag all over pages. I only added that flag to pages that needed them. And changing dates?? Kanto7 (talk) 01:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see by others reverting the changes its not as simple as you think and a talk now needs to talk place with thoses that disagree with the edit. As for date changes this is an example you may be right but the source in the article say others wish and had for 14 years.--Moxy 🍁 01:39, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tuvalu, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.-gadfium 01:12, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Republic of Maryland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unrecognized state.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of the Comoros into French Territory of the Comoros. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. When copying within Wikipedia, please be sure to properly copy the required citations. — Diannaa (talk) 12:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Colony of Liberia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Colony of Liberia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Colony+of+Liberia&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Moxy 🍁 01:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of French Territory of the Comoros

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on French Territory of the Comoros requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://countrystudies.us/comoros/3.htm, http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-3392.html, and https://namecensus.com/reference/country_studies/comoros/HISTORY.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 22:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Insular Government of the Philippine Islands

Hello, I have seen that you reverted my edits on the Insular Philippines, can you please tell me why that's the case? It is completely inaccurate to include Hail Columbia as it is not an official anthem of the USA. Lupang Hinirang should be included as it was reinstated as a territorial anthem when the Flag Act (Philippines) was repealed in 1919. You don't just revert without talking to the editor you reverted as it is against Wikipedia policy. PyroFloe (talk) 00:54, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are adding Lupang Hirang at least change the name of it to the Phillipine Hymn as it was called Kanto7 (talk) 00:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of reverting, you should've just changed that, but I digress. I just warned you for your unconstructive edits that are inaccurately placed, please do not do such things again without consensus. PyroFloe (talk) 01:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Actually, I've been reverting your edits because you've been making changes without any sourcing or explanation. Please explain why you're changing things in your edit summaries. Trivialist (talk) 11:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry Kanto7 (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PyroFloe (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kanto7, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

PyroFloe (talk) 11:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Niger Districts

Hello, Kanto7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Niger Districts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Looking at your edit history, you've been engaging in a lot of weird stuff. Please note, this is a serious project to build an encyclopedia. We're happy to have new people helping, but please take this seriously. If you continue to make non-productive edits in the future, you'll be blocked from editing. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AFIS Security Corps moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, AFIS Security Corps, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:16, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Government of Fernando Poo and Annobón moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Government of Fernando Poo and Annobón, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Arab-Byzantine Condominium

Hello, Kanto7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arab-Byzantine Condominium, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bombay Presidency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Oxenden.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please stop making unexplained changes to articles. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 02:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Colony of Tuvalu

Hello, Kanto7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Colony of Tuvalu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Antigua and Barbuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles I.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spanish Sahara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dakhla.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Colony of Tuvalu

Hello, Kanto7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Colony of Tuvalu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. CMD (talk) 11:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kanto7, you appear to be adding copious content to various articles of historical interest. Please note that you need to follow the policies and guidelines set down in WP:V and WP:RS. --RegentsPark (comment) 01:22, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looking through your history, I notice that this (adding content without sources) is not a new issue with you and I've warned you about this earlier - apologies, I did not recall this earlier (see [1], [2]). Please be aware that continuing to do so may be construed as disruptive or as a WP:CIR issue. --RegentsPark (comment) 01:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per the above notes, please do not copy paste unsourced text into Wikipedia articles from elsewhere, especially not machine translations that haven't even been checked. CMD (talk) 12:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you recently removed content from Western Samoa Trust Territory without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:45, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Western Samoa Trust Territory, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.CMD (talk) 05:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning regarding collaboration and copying

Collaboration is required at Wikipedia. You will be blocked if you repeat contested edits without discussing the issue on the article talk page. For example, your most recent edit is diff at Spanish Guinea. That was the third time you added that text. Please explain where the text came from because it looks as if it has been copied from somewhere and that is not permitted. Johnuniq (talk) 10:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was copy pasted from tge history of Equtorial Guinea in Spanish Wikipedia. Is that against the wiki policy?. In fact all of the edits I have made come from the history section of that country from a wiki of another language Kanto7 (talk) 12:04, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is against policy. Copying text without attribution from anywhere is not permitted. You will be blocked indefinitely if it is repeated. See these earlier explanations on this talk page:

Copying within Wikipedia (22 October 2020)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request) (29 December 2020)
June 2021 (6 June 2021)

A link to an article at the Spanish Wikipedia is written like this: [[:es:Guinea Ecuatorial]] which is displayed as es:Guinea Ecuatorial. If you have any questions, reply here or ask at WP:HELPDESK. Johnuniq (talk) 00:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for diff (unexplained and unattributed copy/paste of 19,045 bytes) after "You will be blocked indefinitely if it is repeated" above, and the numerous other reverts at Spanish Guinea (example) with no substantive explanation. The first diff includes blunders such as "Map of Fernando Poo in 1897" and "Early 20th century (1900-1926) Edit". Mistakes are not a problem, except when they are repeated after warnings. Any appeal of this block would need to address the concerns raised on this talk page and at July 2021 ANI.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 09:43, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Government of Fernando Poo and Annobón (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Government of Fernando Poo and Annobón and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Government of Fernando Poo and Annobón, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 13:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AFIS Security Corps

Hello, Kanto7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AFIS Security Corps, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kanto7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't put this request on User:JesusJohnson7 as I have forgotten the password as I haven't used the account in 2 years. As you can see on the pages I have created (Bukovina District, Margraviate of Istria) the information on these pages is properly sourced. In fact most of my edits on my new accounts have been made in good faith. I am guilty of vandalism, copyright violations and Flogging a dead horse, however I feel that i should be unbanned on Assume good faith Kanto7 (talk) 00:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have clearly demonstrated you are not acting in good faith, continuing to violate WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Your best bet is to go six months with zero edits, then apply under WP:SO. Given the sheer number of illicit sockpuppet accounts you have created, you will have a very high bar to clear at that point. You will need a more honest accounting of your awful behaviour. Yamla (talk) 11:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kanto7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't put this request on User:JesusJohnson7 as I have forgotten the password as I haven't used the account in 2 years. As you can see on the pages I have created (Bukovina District, Margraviate of Istria) the information on these pages is properly sourced. In fact most of my edits on my new accounts have been made in good faith. I am guilty of vandalism, copyright violations and Flogging a dead horse, however I feel that i should be unbanned on the WP:SO as i have gone for more than 6 months without any edits.Kanto7 (talk) 10:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As Yamla notes, you have evaded your block, so this is a decline. PhilKnight (talk) 19:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

|

Confirmed block evasion in July, 2022. This is probably enough for this user to be considered banned by the community under WP:3X. I'll leave the decline to another admin, as I reviewed last time. --Yamla (talk) 16:52, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]