User talk:Legaleagle86

; Archives
	1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4

This is Legaleagle86's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

DYK nomination of Saradha Group financial scandal

Hello! Your submission of Saradha Group financial scandal at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusanLesch (talk) 00:38, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Saradha Group financial scandal

Hello! Your submission of Saradha Group financial scandal at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusanLesch (talk) 14:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Saradha Group financial scandal

Hello! Your submission of Saradha Group financial scandal at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusanLesch (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Saradha Group financial scandal

On 9 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saradha Group financial scandal, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Saradha Group financial scandal is possibly the biggest ponzi collapse in India? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saradha Group financial scandal. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article nomination

Do you have plans to nominate Saradha Group financial scandal‎ for a good article. I am impressed by your work. Solomon7968 (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are still some minor problems with copyedit - like tenses, different styles. once the article has some uniformity we can nominate it for GA. Can you try and look into the issue of copyedit or post the article in the copyeditors forum.LegalEagle (talk) 11:10, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I am now involved in a project to make articles about notable alumni of Indian Statistical Institute. And I am not well experienced in copy edit works. But I can suggest you some improvements.

I will try to make an separate article of Kanwar Deep Singh who is a TMC MP and a owner of Chit fund Alchemist.
Add links of involvement of Mithun Chakraborty to saradha Group.
Add links of involvement of Subhaprasanna to saradha Group.
Add links of involvement of Rice Group headed by Amitava Nandy to saradha Group.This seems to me serious faults of the article. Finding sources of last two are pretty easy. Again I will give my feedback time to time reviewing the article. Solomon7968 (talk) 11:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DSNLU Visakhapatnam- regarding

Hi! May I please know, why u always keep on removing DSNLU from the list of national law universities? Is the University Grants Commission fooling people when it says that it is a national law university? Even the Bar Council of India is doing the same when it says, DSNLU is recognized by it... I'd like to know,considering which reliable source, you keep on doing such Illogical act? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.229.146 (talk) 16:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out, after the sources were provided I refrained from reverting the data posted by you. LegalEagle (talk) 17:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Research and Analysis Wing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Abraham and Kabir Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

R&AW - Rank / Hierarchy

Hi,

Your contributions to the subject in discussion are valuable.

However, the rank structure provided needs to be revised. R&AW unlike IB does not follow the Directorial ranking system. It follows the Ministry of Ext Affairs designations. Under Secretary, Dy. Secretary, Director (only Inclusion),Joint Secretary, Addl. Secretary,Spl. Secretary, Secretary (R). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ns22687 (talk • contribs) 07:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right, after the Emergency the directorial designation was changed to secretarial one, will make appropriate housekeeping changes. If you have time try to find out a bit more about the directors and add to their career history at the collapsible table. LegalEagle (talk) 11:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Virappan leading his group in moily forest.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Virappan leading his group in moily forest.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:11, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hi

sir,i wish to talk to you,my id is raghav.gakhar2010@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.207.45.25 (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saradha Group financial scandal

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Saradha Group financial scandal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to ping you again to remind you of this review. I'll look forward to your thoughts! Thanks, -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:36, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments, I would update the article accordingly in a couple of days.LegalEagle (talk) 16:26, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Saradha Group financial scandal

The article Saradha Group financial scandal you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Saradha Group financial scandal for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NetajiDEATHCERTIFICATE.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NetajiDEATHCERTIFICATE.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:05, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]