User talk:Quackslikeaduck

Welcome!

Hello Quackslikeaduck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Nlu 04:11, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DC election results

You seem to be the one who added most of the election history for DC politicians, so I thought I'd let you know that Gogo Dodo wants to delete that section from the Carol Schwartz article, saying it's too much data and doesn't add to it. I tend to agree that the election results clutter the articles, but I think they are valuable, especially when some of the articles haven't progressed to the point of covering all the elections. I'm wondering whether they should be handled differently, maybe even in separate election articles, and probably with tables. —KCinDC (talk) 02:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More discussion here. —KCinDC (talk) 16:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for minding the Affordable Care Act article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I appreciate very much the details you have added to Nevertheless, she persisted. Thanks for correcting the copy and making the account on the Senate floor more accurate—details matter, and your contributions make the article better. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For your team work on Nevertheless, she persisted. Bearian (talk) 00:31, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Willow, Wisconsin

Hey, it's probably the only time in the history of Willow, Wisconsin that it will ever get any national attention! --Orange Mike | Talk 21:20, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Still not notable. ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 02:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leif Garrett

Hello! I noticed your recent edit to Leif Garrett, and I wanted to ask you why you removed the references and text from the 2006 incident. I haven't gone and reverted it, I just wanted to ask why. ☶☲SouthernKangaroo☶☲ (☎) 13:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I didn't delete the text. I broke up a very long paragraph into several paragraphs and did some other minor revisions. If you look at the Difference Between Revisions [1], it will show that. ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 16:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]