User talk:Quidster4040

User page Talk page Sandbox To Do References Articles created CSD log

Please note that after one month, I move items into archives to keep the talk page less cluttered. Please refer to the archive list below to see any messages or discussions that may have occurred in the past if you do not see it on this page.

Archives

Archive 1 – 2011
Archive 2 – 2012
Archive 3 – 2013
Archive 4 – 2014
Archive 5 – 2015
Archive 6 – 2016
Archive 7 – 2017
Archive 8 – 2018
Archive 9 – 2019
Archive 10 – 2020

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2003 D.C. United season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Stokes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2019 Ohio State Buckeyes men's soccer team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 Ohio State Buckeyes men's soccer team, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Ohio State Buckeyes men's soccer team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 22:54, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quidster4040 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The account GerryLenhart42069 is not affiliated with my account. This was done as an ill-advised prank undertaken that has been outlined on GerryLenhart's talk page. The user of this account has sent an email to the admin team outlining his motives and rationale. Quidster4040 (talk) 23:54, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you have sent "an email to the admin team" making your case, I think it would be better if we deferred to them for the time being. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of FC Tigers Vancouver

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on FC Tigers Vancouver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SunDawn talk 03:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]