User talk:Roux

I like to keep both sides of my discussions together, so if you leave me a message here, I will reply here. If I left a question on your talk page, please reply there; I'm watching your page so I will get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks!

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Naming conventions

Hello, Prince! Could you please give your opinion of my proposal at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Present queens consort and their predecessors? Surtsicna (talk) 10:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-encyclopaedic comment

Ooh, since we're associates: Would you like to come round for dinner tomorrow? :) --Cameron * 20:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Depends whether you visit me on the continent or in the UK. The legal drinking age varies. :) --Cameron * 13:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS:Have you considered helping out at the refence desk? In particular the humanities desk would be well suited to you. I answer questions there too (from time to time). Regards, --Cameron * 13:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vatican City

You mean like Manchester City? In the article thereon, one sees both, but I'm not too bothered. Rothorpe (talk) 17:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation requested

for this [1]. Thank you, THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 00:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

cool thanks. I saw that there was some back and forth over names and titles and the such and was concerned I may have added back something that was wrong. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 00:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Salva

Many peadophiles may identify themselves as gay or straight, but the idea of lusting after children and adults at the same time is simply illogical, as we can only really be attracted to one specific age group. Anyway! I don't want to get into an argument with anybody, so I'll just say thank you for the message and I won't remove the entry again.

Yours,

--6afraidof7 (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Age groups

Maybe my own personal feelings on the subject are somewhat blurring my argument; at the end of the day, I guess I was just irritated by the Victor Salva entry because I've heard so many people in the past equate being gay with being perverse. If a man who identifies as gay abuses a male child, then people receive the impression that all gay men are child abusers, but if a man who identifies as straight abuses a female child, then people regard it as a one off and not a reflection on heterosexuality as a whole. I've had this same argument with both my parents and somebody at college, because I'm sick of people assuming that child abuse is just a part of being gay.

Yours,

--6afraidof7 (talk) 16:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Thanks! It was actually a lot easier than I thought. You merely write a new article and then submit your DYK suggestion on the DYK talk page and tada it's on the main page a few hours later! --Cameron * 19:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've already been giggling about that...I realised just as I was saving! Just to clarify: I meant new sec, as in section! ;) What kind of article are you considering starting? --Cameron * 19:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, just saw your edit summary! Stop it! Wikipedia will chuck us out! :) --Cameron * 19:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, sorry. I'll help you out on the new article (if you need it) to make up. :) --Cameron * 20:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Olympics

Are you Admin? (Please answer).

Did you read the talk page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MissOrgum1996 (talk • contribs) 08:41, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Psychological Warfare

"Let me explain something: reporting on a fact is not 'supporting terrorists'" If new reports of an anthrax mail scare then this is successful form of terrosirm (no matter if there is anthrax mail or not). Perhaps you should check the wiki page on terrorism.--MissOrgum1996 (talk) 09:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]