User talk:Twaz

i talk to myself

and listen to 9th ward - me and my choppa

"I sleep with her, creep with her, eat with her."

I take advice, but don't preach.

Twaz (talk) 02:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Please stop signing your posts with "invisible bureaucrat." Doing this implies that you have a bureaucratic position on Wikipedia, which you do not. This can be confusing to the other users. Thanks, Metros (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please add comments to the bottom of talk pages rather than to the top. Oldest at the top to the newest at the bottom is the general standard at Wikipedia. Thanks, Metros (talk) 04:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Hello Twaz. Could you please change your signature? It suggests you have an official role here - The level of Bureaucrat is an access level on Wikipedia and people may perceive that you are a bureaucrat and your signature will no doubt cause confusion. Thanks in advance. Ryan Postlethwaite 04:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you have refused to do this - I've blocked you indefinitely because you are applying an official role with your account. If you are willing to change your signature, or you would like to appeal this block, please place {{unblock|reason for unblock. ~~~~}} on your user talk page. Ryan Postlethwaite 04:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not changing my User Name

I am providing a free service here by busting vandals. Honestly we're all here to improve the encyclopedic quality of Wikipedia. So let's leave it at that. Because I only like to use my Law Degree at work.InvisibleBureaucrat (talk) 04:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Twaz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm freaking new here. InvisibleBureaucrat implies nothing but a black hand that busts vandals Brother. This is a perfect example of when a sysop goes to far over nothing. Look at my edit list from my FIRST day. I think rationale speaks best when everyone is afforded the right to speak it. If he doesn't like my reply, he shouldn't confront me about insignificant incidents like a username that only a 12 year old would mistake as an official title. A Bureaucrat can be anything from an elected official to an aide or intern. Even private sector Lawyers are often referred to as bureaucrats. If it is really that confusing for him, maybe he shouldn't be an admin?InvisibleBureaucrat (talk) 04:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Bureaucrats are the next level above adminsitrators in the Wikipedia mod heirarchy. To use the term in your user signature is to imply that you have levels of access at Wikipedia that you do not. You were told to cease and desist, and you refused to do so. I see no reason to unblock at this point. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Twaz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Jayron32, Sir. You should be an inpiration to Ryan. You actually explained it to me. Thank you man. If he would have done that, and maybe even discussed it, we could have probably avoided this. I am changing it as soon as I save this page. And it seems like that guy Metros is a walking liablity for user retention.

Decline reason:

No reason given. — Lara❤Love 05:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Oh, I see. Between your comments about Ryan and Metros, your comment showing your willingness to change your name in your sig sort of got overshadowed. Please don't make any more edits with an inappropriate name in your sig, otherwise the block will be reinstated. Happy editing.

Request handled by: Lara❤Love 05:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it

You get unblocked and the first thing you do is this: [1] and [2]. That's not a good idea. I suggest you avoid any further contact with those two users, and refrain from that kind of behavior. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism notice

I was not the person who put that there. I was trying to correct the governor's mistake. I was in the process of trying to fix that when I found it later. I've already discussed this with someone else.65.65.230.53 (talk) 16:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]