User talk:WALTHAM2
Welcome
|
It's great to see you edit this page. But please could I ask for care when you do so. By removing the }} at the end of a letter section (have a look at your edit to "L", you remove the columns. It's an essential part of the column template. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Punjab
Hi, I see you're creating a lot of articles with references to Punjab in them. You may not realise but Punjab is a disambiguation page. It would be really helpful if you could pipe your links to Punjab (Pakistan) rather than just put square brackets round Punjab. It saves a lot of work in the long run. If you need a hand learning how to do this don't hesitate to contact me. : ) Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 22:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hi again. Waltham, when you're writing your articles and you want to refer to the Pakistani state of Punjab would you please write [[Punjab, Pakistan|Punjab]] rather than [[Punjab]]. The first will result in a link that looks like this Punjab but links to the page on the Pakistani state rather than the disambiguation page. It makes things easier for your readers. Thanks. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 06:24, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Jats of Sindh
Hi, Dear you created this article , which is redirected to Muslim Jats, now kindly provide some sound references to restore this article to a full article status. see all previous revisionsand compile a best proof read article. see its talk for the references suggestions. Help me in finding its references and restoring it to a full article status,,,,,Thanks --Jogi 007 (talk) 12:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Sorry I no longer edit on Wikepedia. I profoundly disagree with inopriaiate attitude. I am anthropologist by training from two very well respected London University Colleges, and quite frankly the rubbish that appears here is not worth my while. Also the personal attacks, abuse and bullying.
On books try Al-hind: The Making of the Indo-islamic World by Andre Wink or Settlers, Saints and Sovereigns: An Ethnography of State Formation in Western India by Farhana Ibrahim and The Jat of Pakistan by Sigrid Westphal Hellbusch and Heinz Westphal --WALTHAM2 (talk) 15:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Audichya Brahmin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Audichya Brahmin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audichya Brahmin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, WALTHAM2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Chaudhari (S.T) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chaudhari (S.T). Since you had some involvement with the Chaudhari (S.T) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
1901 Census of the North West Frontier Province listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1901 Census of the North West Frontier Province. Since you had some involvement with the 1901 Census of the North West Frontier Province redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sitush (talk) 12:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
{{Ivmbox|Hello, WALTHAM2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article Bakho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be noted that the two sources found upon a GBook search, which covers the topic, (one of which is included here as a reference), has been plagiarized in toto from Raj-era sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Winged BladesGodric 08:44, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Chhipi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Winged BladesGodric 12:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Chobdar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chobdar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chobdar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged BladesGodric 12:41, 15 June 2018 (UTC)