Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive169
User:Darkness Shines reported by User:Headbomb (Result: Protected)
Page: Journal of Cosmology (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Darkness Shines (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: User is well established and familiar with 3RR policies
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [6]
Comments: User keeps removing expert blogs cited multiple times by other sources per some misunderstanding of what WP:SPS actually says. E.g. Pharyngula (blog) is an award-winning blog from PZ Myers, which Nature (journal) recognized as the top science blog of 2006. Likewise for Phil Plait and his Bad Astronomy published in Discover magazine. Battison herself published in the Journal of Cosmology and gave a hard look at the peer reviewing process from the Journal of Cosmology. Rosie Redfield also gave a point-by-point debunking on the Hoover claims. All these sources were widely quote in the media, and are as reliable as it gets. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
BLP removals are not a revert. Using this blog to call the journals editors "Cranks" isa violation of BLP policy. I will also point out Headbomb has done three reverts, with one after BLP concerns were raised[7]. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:55, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Those are not BLP removals, as the quotes are fully attributed to whoever made them, reflect mainstream opinion, and were published in reliable and recognized sources.Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- You used a Blog to call BLP`s "cranks" if this is so mainstream why use a blog and not a newspaper or journal? Darkness Shines (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Full protection, 3 days - work it out on talk. Vsmith (talk) 21:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
User:Phukkeri reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: 1 week)
Page: Mayawati (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Phukkeri (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [8]
- 1st revert: [9]
- 2nd revert: [10]
- 3rd revert: [11]
- 4th revert: [12]
- 5th revert: through sock IP 24.21.18.209
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning and other notices: [13]
Comments:
Assorted copyvio infringements, statements not covered by citations and citing Wikipedia articles. Continues unabated despite multiple warnings. Violations of WP:BLP. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 07:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Blocked – for a period of 1 week FASTILY (TALK) 22:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Fastily. Take care. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 23:01, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
User:Sankarrukku reported by User:Chektomate (Result: 24 hours)
Page: Kerala Iyers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Sankarrukku (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [14]
Reverts done today:
Older reverts within 3 days:
The user is trying to glorify the article, which is about a caste in India. He has removed the refimprove/peacock tags from the page, and is reverting since a week.
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
[[28]]
Comments:
Even after 3 warnings issued to the user, the artice is getting reverted. Chektomate (talk) 12:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Four reverts in 24 hours (12:08,06:51,06:06,02:47) and many warnings about 3RR. Kuru (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
User:Tamilan101 reported by User:Secret of success (Result: Warned)
Page: Wanted (2009 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Tamilan101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [29]
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]
Comments:I haven't even received a summary from this user for his unexplained vandalizing reverts in the Wanted (2009 film) page. He seems to be a die-hard Kollywood fan (no use of WP:AGF here) and reverted mine and User:Managerarc's edits 4 or 5 times on changing the sentence to saying that "It is a remake of the Telugu film Pokiri". He wants it read that it is a remake of the Tamil remake of the Telugu film. I posted a notice in his page asking him to explain why he did it and I have provided a valid reason "In case of multiple remakes, the original writer is credited, so the original film i.e the Telugu version, is the film from which this has been remade" but no summaries or response has been received. Please block him at least for sometime and here's a link to his talk page in which I gave a warning. Thank you!
Warned Re-report if the user continues to edit war. FASTILY (TALK) 22:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
User:86.176.153.183 (talk) reported by User:Leaky caldron (Result: duplicate)
Page: Big Brother 2011 (UK) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: User:86.176.153.183 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [34]
- see diffs identified in simultaneous report of same user/topic, following this report.
- 1st revert: [diff]
- 2nd revert: [diff]
- 3rd revert: [diff]
- 4th revert: [diff]
- This latest revert diff edit summary [35]appears to imply ownership of the article. I assume the "c" is intended to indicate copyright! However, it may be that he is agreeing to cease from further disruption.Leaky Caldron 15:28, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [36]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [37]
plus response from IP [38] alleging censorship and ignoring consensus.
Comments:
- Closed per report below. Kuru (talk) 15:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
User:86.176.153.183 reported by User:LadyofShalott (Result: 24 hours)
Page: Big Brother 2011 (UK) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Big Brother 2011 (UK) (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [39]
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Big Brother 2011 (UK)#Removal of non-encyclopaedic material
Comments:
I didn't realize Leaky Cauldron was also making a report. As it seems we have given slightly different information, can our two reports be merged somehow? LadyofShalott 14:58, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Was warned; pretty simple. Kuru (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
User:Westvoja and User:Davejohnsan reported by User:Jasper Deng (Result: 1 week)
Page: Two and a Half Men (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Users being reported: Westvoja (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Davejohnsan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [45]
Reverts by Westvoja:
Reverts by Davejohnsan (including two misuses of Rollback):
- 1st revert (Rollback misuse): [51]
- 2nd revert: [52]
- 3rd revert (Rollback misuse): [53]
- 4th revert: [54]
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning (for Westvoja, Davejohnsan is experienced enough to know to not edit war): [55]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [56]
Comments:
- Note:I'm not involved in this edit war, but decided to report it. Seems to be a hint of incivility (by Westvoja) as well here.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Blocked – for a period of 1 week -FASTILY (TALK) 22:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Shouldn't the other user be blocked too?Jasper Deng (talk) 22:28, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Nobody warned him. I'm not inclined to block User:Davejohnsan without notice. You can warn him if you like though... -FASTILY (TALK) 22:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- He was the one who gave the warning (see the diff), which implies he understands it. Plus, the misuse of rollback is something to look at too.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Warned now. I am, however, not comfortable blocking or revoking rollback privileges at this time. -FASTILY (TALK) 22:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- He was the one who gave the warning (see the diff), which implies he understands it. Plus, the misuse of rollback is something to look at too.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Nobody warned him. I'm not inclined to block User:Davejohnsan without notice. You can warn him if you like though... -FASTILY (TALK) 22:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC)