Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Countries

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Countries

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo, Crystal ball, fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 13:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's a recreation of an article that was speedied as A7 and G11 in September 2015, and is IMHO no more notable now than it was then (I would have nominated it for speedy deletion if it hadn't been here at AfD...). Thomas.W ^talk 13:55, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{Let It Go} 14:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{Let It Go} 14:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{Let It Go} 14:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt - per above and previous speedy dels. Mabalu (talk) 20:34, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom until there is evidence of sufficient coverage from reliable third party publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Complete and absolute failure of WP:GNG, WP:ORG and WP:EVENT. No reliable source coverage found in independent searches. The article's two independent "references" are exceptionally dodgy. One is a blog site where anyone can post, and the post was made a few days ago by a newbie member. The other pageant blog ref is nearly identical copying whole paragraphs verbatim. Both read like the organization's about us page or PR boilerplate. There is no credible assertion of notability. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails WP;EVENT & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 00:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.