Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 November 3
Appearance
November 3
- Image is a mock, high resolution and the original source no longer exists. Suggest a new image of the former ITV3 logo is uploaded in place of this. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 03:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Image is a mock, high resolution and the original source no longer exists. Suggest a new image of the former ITV3 logo is uploaded in place of this. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 03:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Image is a mock, high resolution and the original source no longer exists. Suggest a new image of the former ITV3 logo is uploaded in place of this. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 03:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Wikiwoohoo (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image not really necessary in the BBC London News article. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 03:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic and low quality. This user-created stick figure image is unlikely to ever be employed in a useful fashion on the encyclopedia. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, feel free to delete it. (I created it).Gabr-el 16:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- The use of this copyrighted Time Magazine cover is not justified. According to the fair use rationale, the image is used (1) to "show the level of infamy he [the guy featured] achieved" and (2) to "bring visual stimuli to an article mainly full of dense text". The first purpose could be accomplished with 1 line of text (like "the guy was so famous that he was on Time's cover that week) and the second (if really judged necessary) could be accomplished with some user created image (we can't simply say: This use is fair because otherwise our article would be boring). Damiens.rf 12:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. "Replaceable? unknown" sums it up. Should only be used if no alternative free image is available, and "unknown" implies "didn't look". Unusual? Quite TalkQu 21:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Nomadtales (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image has no verifiable source, but my taggings were repeatedly removed. This is claimed to be a picture of the construction of a bridge that was inaugurated on 1910. This would mean the image's copyright would be expired today. But, without a verifiable source, we can't really say this picture is really what it says it is. Using unsourced images like this opens a grave precedent. Yes, this image is probably what it says it is, but just like anything else on Wikipedia, we need verifiable sources. Damiens.rf 12:50, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep and block user for disruption. This is a very obviously public domain image. This user has had this pointed out to him by myself, Theresa Knott, and numerous other users, but has persisted in repeatedly nominating it for deletion. Rebecca (talk) 13:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- You're an admin. If you honestly believe I should be blocked, go on and do it yourself and face the consequences, instead of inciting others to do so. IFD is for discussion about the images, not the editors. Please keep your rant elsewhere. --Damiens.rf 17:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Quality and content of the photograph suggests its age is as stated and hence it is now public domain. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 13:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)\
- Keep and block nominator for disruption - per reasons said by Rebecca, and also disruptively nominated this image when it was clearly stated it was in the Public Domain and is a work of the Australian government. --[[::User:Arnzy|Arnzy]] ([[::User talk:Arnzy|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Arnzy|contribs]]) 14:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep and block nominator for disruption' per Rebecca and Arnzy. The user has been warned about nominating this again. JRG (talk) 00:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Flcelloguy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image has no source and it's vague fair use rationale can not justify the use of this image in 6 articles. Damiens.rf 14:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, but reduce usage. My rationale with references to WP:NFCC: Clauses 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 seem to apply. Clause 1 applies to one of the articles, History of the Soviet Union (1953–1985), as an official depection aids understanding in this context. Clause 3 has not been met - image is not essential in other articles so should be removed from these. Clause 10 - some work required to include copyright holder name, etc., but should be fixable. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 16:33, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Unusual. —Ed 17 for President Vote for Ed 17:55, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- GreenRunner0 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- It's a copyrighted image, done by Gibson to promote their guitars. It's clearly not a Creative Commons, and barely it would qualify for any fair use, as it's possible to replace it with free equivalent. GreyCat (talk) 17:53, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Wilson hood (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic, too high res. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Too low-res to be useful. Doesn't seem to be actual single cover (it's just a pic of Billy). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Horribly poor resolution. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 21:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Capture from a music video, can't be Creative Commons I'm sure. Unencyclopedic either way. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Capture from a music video, can't be Creative Commons I'm sure. Unencyclopedic either way. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Capture from a music video, can't be Creative Commons I'm sure. Unencyclopedic either way. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Capture from a music video, can't be Creative Commons I'm sure. Unencyclopedic either way. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Capture from a music video, can't be Creative Commons I'm sure. Unencyclopedic either way. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Capture from a music video, can't be Creative Commons I'm sure. Unencyclopedic either way. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Capture from a music video, can't be Creative Commons I'm sure. Unencyclopedic either way. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Being used to identify the artist, not the album. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)