[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 173.46.208.190 (talk) at 18:48, 30 November 2012 (→Democratic Republic of Ebernesia: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Estakhr's Constant (physics)

reasoning -5.122.201.136 (talk) 06:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i found this article: Estakhr Constant (physics) interesting.

why it was deleted!? I want to use the paper for my research.

while you have an article like this:Worldsheet in wikipedia without any reference this is not fair to delete this one Estakhr Constant (physics)

i think it can be confirmed in Wikipedia as a non peer-reviewed physics paper — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.122.201.136 (talk) 07:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estakhr's Constant (physics), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the User:Fram who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. Lectonar (talk) 09:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

article was deleted with 'NO' scientific reason!. i use google cached webpage, article was really interesting!. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.120.19.66 (talk) 09:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bump (Internet)

Pages link to it and it is a topic that deserves to be on Wikipedia. -Port A Build (talk) 03:34, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gauntlet Hair

Contesting PROD. The press coverage of this band's last album easily will pass WP:MUSIC. -Chubbles (talk) 07:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Duran

new article/subject -JosephDann (talk) 12:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC)— JosephDann (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Duran, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Timotheus Canens (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

United People's Party (UK)

reasoning -193.130.78.102 (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United People's Party (UK), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Shimeru (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sufian Younas Khan

reasoning -Stevenparkerukpi (talk) 18:14, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This page was important because this man sufian younas khan did a lot of thing in Wah Cantt Pakistan for welfare cause like social campaigns, provided employment, introduced 1st Call center in wah cantt and started Free Training for Gym and Karate.

I will request you to undelete this page.

it:CSOA La Strada

reasoning -82.49.193.204 (talk) 14:33, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I linked this article (Italian Wikipedia, title "CSOA La Strada") some time ago from openstreetmap, and by the time I was reviewing the article and it made sense to link against, recently I found it deleted. Maybe the user deleted also other Stuff?

I tried to undelete it myself, but than found a message that undeletions were restricted to admins.

thank you, Martin

 Not done. There has never been a page CSOA La Strada here on the English Wikipedia. The Italian Wikipedia is a separate organization with its own rules and standards. The Italian page was deleted there after this discussion, and you should approach the Italian administrator who closed it, whose name you can find at the foot of the discussion. JohnCD (talk)

Full Throttle Media

I believe I made changes the conform with the Wikipedia guidelines. Admittedly, I was not familiar with the Wikipedia guidelines and am still learning the site. Any advice you have for me would be appreciated. -Full Throttle Media (talk) 16:38, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done Usernames here must represent people, not companies. And you should not write about your own company, as it will be very hard for you to not promote it. The page you talked about User:Full Throttle Media contained promotional text. Dubious content includes "the vision we have" "highly developed" "break out brand" "high-quality, innovative" "We fully embrace the challenge" "cutting edge" "Our brand" "groundbreaking" "RJ understands" "we are welcomed into the inner circle" "is a testament to the desire" and so on. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yves Arman

page is referenced with links in many related pages and was about to be completed with more information, like the french page on the same article, which is not deleted -Faranne (talk) 01:53, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As it's an expired WP:PROD, it can be undeleted - however, I would highly recommend that it be immediately move out of articlespace into a personal sandbox as a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT. There's nothing there that remotely hints at the notability requirements on the English Wikipedia which are very very different than the French Wikipedia. In other words, it will immediately be WP:AFD'd, and was originally eligible for immediate deletion in the first place. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:34, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Bwilkins' advice is good. I have "userfied" the page to User:Faranne/Yves Arman where you can work on it. As it was deleted by PROD, you are free to move it back to the main encyclopedia, but in its present state it would certainly be sent to WP:Articles for deletion. Advice on your talk page later today. JohnCD (talk) 12:14, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Grate_(band)

a7 -188.2.33.214 (talk) 14:19, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,

My name is Goran Beg, and i'm one of memebers of Grate band. Please, i don't understand why are you delete our band wiki page. It's normal wiki page, like other bands have. If we make some mistake, plase let us know.

It's very important for us to have wiki page for our band. We play rock/metal music since 2007, so plase tell us what to do.

Thank you.

Groove (Transformers)

Please userify so I can work on the page. Thanks! -Mathewignash (talk) 15:05, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Nyttend (talk) 05:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Constantin

reasoning -LaGloiredujour (talk) 15:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues In Darusman Report

I have reverted the copyright issues and wrote the article on my words after claiming it has copyright problems. But still it has been deleted. -Himesh84 (talk) 05:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rasamalai

OK, it seems I had an user page that was deleted, I'm copy pasting the e-mail notification I got in some British language I don's speak, perhaps Scottish: Please monitor whomever was trying to delete it since it seems like a trigger happy person who never bothered to contact me first to see if I'm a real person or not, and whatever happens I hope he never gets to run anything on your website.ç

Best regards, Claudia Liliana/rasamalai


Dear Rasamalai,

the Wikipedia page User talk:Rasamalai haes been creatit on 26 November 2012 bi MF-Warburg, see http://sco.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rasamalai for the current version.

This is a new page.

Editor's summary: content wis: '{{delete|spam account}}' (an the ae contreibutor wis '99.237.226.18')

Contact the editor: mail http://sco.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Emailuser&target=MF-Warburg wiki http://sco.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MF-Warburg

The will be nae ither notifications in case o faurer chynges unless ye visit this page. Ye cuid reset the notification flags for aa yer watched pages on yer watchleet forbye. 

           Yer freendlie Wikipedia notification seestem

-- Tae chynge yer watchleet settins, visit http://sco.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Watchlist&edit=yes

Feedback an faurer assistance: http://sco.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents


reasoning -Rasamalai (talk) 07:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page on the English Wikipedia has never been deleted. It appears you created a page on the Scots Wikipedia, which was deleted - that's a different website, and we at en-wiki have no control over what they do there. The messages above all refer to sco-wiki (which also explains the dialect. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:26, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome and advice added on user's en:wp talk page. JohnCD (talk) 13:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dakota (musician)

This article has been created, and used correctly following wiki's guidelines. It was created by myself who is a fan and wanted to give accurate details about their fellow Chicago artist. There are ACCURATE cites, yes all of which are blogs, but they are straight from the artists page or pages with notable credibility. This page has only been edited by one member because of the validity of the sources and to my knowledge, there is not much info that must be changed except minor edits. I have followed all of Wiki's guidelines, rules, and provided accurate and quality information that people have been searching the internet for. This page should NOT have been deleted. Please reconsider your decision. Thank you -TheCANNON123 (talk) 12:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dakota (musician), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Michig (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Lectonar (talk) 12:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonnee Buttered Beef Steaks

reasoning -65.12.201.178 (talk) 02:21, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

01:18, 28 September 2012 Explicit (talk | contribs) deleted page Bonnee Buttered Beef Steaks (Expired PROD, concern was: non-notable product.)

Please restore my article about Bonnee Buttered Beef Steaks. This product is no longer sold, but it was widely sold from the mid 1940's to the mid 1960's in the US, and a lot of baby boomers remember them fondly and wonder what happened to the company that made them. Thank you for your consideration of my request.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Lectonar (talk) 13:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
See: Bonnee Buttered Beef Steaks

Paul B. Wiegmann

the article was deleted because of copyright infringement. This was a simple glitch which is easy to correct. I request the restoration of the article in my user space so that I could correct the glitch -Awwriter (talk) 13:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awwriter (talk) 13:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page is a copyright violation. We do not even restore those to userspace. Lectonar (talk) 13:55, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shivnarayanpur,mathurapur

I cannot understand why this was deleted under G1. It only had some grammatical mistakes -Anbu121 (talk me) 16:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: the first half may have made some sense, but the second half was entirely uncomprehensible. Can you explain what "Shivnarayanpur are in " followed by a list of things that includes "DJ Masters" actually means?? There also was not even a single reference to be found (✉→BWilkins←✎) 17:45, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can remember, the list included things/places/shops that were present in the village. But, even then, how come G1 applies to it? Isn't G1 supposed to be for an article where you don't understand what the article is talking about. --Anbu121 (talk me) 19:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and the second half of the article made the entire article nonsensical (✉→BWilkins←✎) 19:42, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Its just poor writing and poor grammar. I still feel that deleting it under G1 is unjust. I will clean it up, if restored. --Anbu121 (talk me) 20:21, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anbu121, 50% of the edits on that article were yours, including explicitly claiming in an edit summary that you were performing a "clean up". Yet, this is the result;

In mathurapur many peoples are rich some peoples are those poor and shivnarayanpur is also not in down position this is also in equal position. Shivnarayanpur are in :- 1. Block 2. Famous market 3. people reach 4. Show Rooms 5. Police Station 6. Big Buildings 7. Bus Stoppages 8. Park 9. DJ Masters 10. Airtel,Reliance,Vodafone,Idea,Uni nor, BSNL, Tata Docomo Towers

This is is incoherent gibberish(G1). I'm not confident this will survive inclusion if restored.--Hu12 (talk) 05:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Initially I removed some irrelevant text at the bottom of the article. Then I rephrased the first sentence and added wikilinks. To rephrase the above quoted text, I was googling to find some source. But the article was deleted before I could do so. Do you think, I am not capable of cleaning this up. Believe me, I have written a GA. In any case, I still wouldn't accept that the quoted text is G1, its just poor writing and poor grammar by a person who is semi-literate. The intention of this quoted text is to communicate that the neighbouring village 'mathurapur' has some rich people, but the village 'Shivnarayanpur' (subject of the article) is not in a impoverished condition and that the village has a market, some showrooms, police station, bus stand, park, etc. --Anbu121 (talk me) 05:26, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how any of the above is relevant? A list of shops and base services is not appropriate in any article (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Even if irrelevant, how will that come under G1? Even if you delete this entire sentence from the article, the first sentence alone stating that it is a village is sufficient for a stub. --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have recreated the stub for you at Shivnarayanpur. There seems to be enough evidence online that this exists. Please add references and categories etc. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but I really didn't expect this amount of resistance and defending for a mistake. --Anbu121 (talk me) 11:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maverick 58 Classic Rock Band

I Saved in English Wikipedia by mistake, need the text to portuguese wikipedia, could you email me, took me a couple of hours writeng -Camabap (talk) 18:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done sent via mail. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caitlin Kelly

Administrator who deleted the page claimed it was an advertisement. The page was about a luxury swimwear designer that was created in a similar fashion to that of Rachael Zoe, the stylist. When asked for additional information, the administrator refused to elaborate. -Tamara Walker (talk) 21:51, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional garbage like "These programs pushed her harder than she had ever been pushed creatively, but she flourished under the pressure and scrutiny. As a result of her hard work and unwavering tenacity" has no place in an encyclopedia article. The deleting admin was very right. --Orange Mike | Talk 08:26, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dale J. Stephens

Looks like the page was automatically deleted after the tag WP:PROD had remained on the page for seven days. Checked google archives and the page has sources from CNN, The New York Times, ABC, among others, so it meets the notability for WP:BLP. -Godfatherscookies (talk) 22:12, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree: after discussion on the Talk page, Stephens failed to meet the basic criteria for WP:BIO or WP:BLP given WP:WHYN and WP:N (and some instances of WP:SPIP). Coverage in the media is not, in and of itself, sufficient criteria for notability. Further, specifically on his book, it must actually be published before he meets the criteria for being an author. Steuben (talk) 22:37, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stephens has an overwhelming quantity and quality of press to meet notability for living people. These are from the most credible, reliable sources publications possible: Inc. Magazine: http://www.inc.com/magazine/201109/peter-thiel-college-dropouts.html CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/18/opinion/bennett-thiel-education/index.html Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/youth-radio-youth-media-international/creator-of-uncollege-gets_b_871214.html?ref=tw The Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/dale-stephens-unschoolers-create-their-education/2011/08/22/gIQAp3VMjJ_story.html ABC: http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/education&id=8151836 New York Magazine: http://nymag.com/news/features/college-education-2011-5/index4.html

The page should be restored based on those sources alone. Godfatherscookies (talk) 23:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We did consider that, but the sources had no further insight into his notability other than a self-appointed expert. The number of sources (and quality) still, in this case, don't justify encyclopedic record—at least not until he's accomplished something "notable," which the discussion failed to show. Again, this seems to be rehashing what was actually in the article and not discussion of the article itself; these arguments were made and addressed in the Talk page so until something changes, it doesn't belong. I'm actually actively looking for someone who knows him (and I know people) to try to see if there's something to be revived here, but no luck thus far. Steuben (talk) 23:40, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. It may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a discussion lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 15:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sardar Mahadik family Gwalior

reasoning -114.143.120.89 (talk) 09:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done That page was deleted in a community discussion, and this page isn't for challenging the results of deletion discussions like that. If you believe that the deletion discussion concluded wrongly, please go to WP:DRV to contest it, since (unlike here) that page is set up to evaluate malformed deletion discussions. Nyttend (talk) 15:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: - recreated at Sardar Mahadik Family Gwalior, tagged G4. JohnCD (talk) 17:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dom497/AFC Newsletter

Requesting undelete to User:Nathan2055/sandbox/afcnewsletter. I know it's weird because it's another users userpage, but if you look at the history you can see I was a major contributor. -Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yes, definitely unusual, but since userspace pages don't 100% belong to their users, there's nothing inappropriate here. Thanks for pointing out that you were a major contributor; I might not have made that connection if you hadn't mentioned it, and I wouldn't undelete someone else's userpage without a good reason. Nyttend (talk) 23:35, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Nyttend! Dom said to me on his talk page that he isn't interested in the newsletter project any more, so I'm going to take it over. --Nathan2055talk - contribs 04:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Bieber Death Hoax

I received a speedy notify of this, and this article was deleted per CSD G3. To my recollection, I never created the article. I'm looking, then, to request a user sub page for this article so that I may review the history. To note, I have changed my password on this and my main account. I would like this undeleted and userfied to me, then, so that I may review the history and see just what was put in. Once I look at this, I will go ahead and perform a user-requested speedy. -Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:43, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't understand why this was deleted as a hoax, since it presents the incident by saying that it was a hoax; it wasn't an attempt to deceive anyone. See my comment on Dennis' talk page, where I've asked him if my comment be all he needs, or if he still prefer that I restore the page. Please don't restore it and please don't decline this request until we hear back from him. Nyttend (talk) 03:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Nyttend. The explanation you gave on my other talk page does help me sort this out, but I'd like the userfy nevertheless because I am now curious as to what spurred this to be submitted for A3 and CSD'd G3. If I'd created a redirect, I'd think that there would be better means that fit better, but still.... --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 10:25, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well you worked on it on 10 March 2010 with this edit summary: "I'm going to work on good faith that Mr. Bieber may or may not have been subject to some death hoax. Seems a potential search term." Nowyouseeme blanked your redirect in 2012 with this edit summary "(Shouldn't exist; target page has no mention of this)" then tagged with A1, reverted, and then A3, but was actually deleted with G3 as reason. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:44, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
guess that's all I need to know then. You think it's worthy of recreation? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 15:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

flight level aviation

reasoning -98.111.233.114 (talk) 03:13, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done That page was deleted in a community discussion, and this page isn't for challenging the results of deletion discussions like that. If you believe that the deletion discussion concluded wrongly, please go to WP:DRV to contest it, since (unlike here) that page is set up to evaluate malformed deletion discussions. Alternatively, you could present multiple reliable sources that discuss this company in depth, since the sole reason that it was deleted is that it didn't appear to have sufficient reliable sources that covered it. Nyttend (talk) 03:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JayData

The article was deleted because of missing citations. The review process and my holidays haven't been aligned. Now I have the fixed article on my PC, which conforms the requirements, I will be able to finish it after you help me to undelete. Thank you -Bonayr (talk) 10:48, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOFTER

In Chinese Wikipedia, LOFTER is a existing page and no administrator thought that the article is an advertisement and deleted it. So, deleting LOFTER as a reason of advertising may be overusing the guidelines? I think, If a person want to delete this article, he had better to announce that too little people have interest in what it talks about, or WP:NPOV. Also, I don't think delete an article which translated from Chinese Wikipedia is a good idea. -AppleJoyNeop (talk) 12:03, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done zh-wiki has different inclusion requirements, so the presence of an article there does not mean that it is necessarily acceptable on en-wiki. The article read like a press release, announcing that Lofter is "opened to sign up" and quoting their promotional literature. In addition, the only mention in an independent source is a passing note of the website's existtence in a general article on blogging in China: even if the page were not a candidate for deletion under G11, it would still fall under WP:A7 and be deleted for lack of notability. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Bell Canada

reasoning -208.69.10.34 (talk) 14:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bell Canada, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:35, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Republic of Ebernesia

was deleted by author and I would like it be undeleted for the page is quite relevant in today's society -173.46.208.190 (talk) 18:48, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=525739364"