[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Examine individual changes

This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Edit Filter for an individual change.

Variables generated for this change

VariableValue
Edit count of the user (user_editcount)
3373
Name of the user account (user_name)
'Aunva6'
Age of the user account (user_age)
186700858
Groups (including implicit) the user is in (user_groups)
[ 0 => 'reviewer', 1 => 'rollbacker', 2 => '*', 3 => 'user', 4 => 'autoconfirmed' ]
Whether or not a user is editing through the mobile interface (user_mobile)
false
Page ID (page_id)
7893483
Page namespace (page_namespace)
3
Page title without namespace (page_title)
'Tokyogirl79'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'User talk:Tokyogirl79'
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
'/* A barnstar for you! */ new WikiLove message'
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
false
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} {{archive banner}} == Thank you == thank you for deleting my page [[User:Skpstephen|Stephen]] ([[User talk:Skpstephen|talk]]) 11:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC) *No problem! [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 12:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == Thanks == Well, you were correct. The "Average Homeboy" page has been deleted through an AfD.. Myself and others have written articles about "Average Homeboy." Even though, many credible references have been sited in these articles, the pages have been deleted. I would greatly appreciate any kind of suggestions or assistance that you could lend on how to prevent a legitimate article from deletion. Sincerely, [[User:Rayhazen |Rayhazen ]] <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rayhazen|Rayhazen]] ([[User talk:Rayhazen|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rayhazen|contribs]]) 00:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> *You can always argue the point for [[Average Homeboy]] at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]], as the page did have more sourcing than some of the prior pages did and the text was not substantially the same. I don't necessarily know that it would have passed notability guidelines if it'd run through an additional AfD, but I do think that it was different enough to warrant another discussion. I'll broach the subject with the other editor that deleted the page. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 03:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC) *It looks like it was speedy deleted, not run through another AfD, so you could always argue against that at deletion review since the article's content and sourcing was fairly different from the version deleted at AfD. In any case, it all really boils down to coverage over a long period of time. I can actually see where you could argue for inclusion since the coverage has been over a relatively wide span of time, but I can see where others might argue otherwise as well. Deletion review is probably the best place for this. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 03:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC) ==Regarding your Yellow Wallpaper Deletion== There are published sources referenced at the bottom of the page. Newspapers and magazine (Pennyblood Magazine and Tolucan Times Newspaper to name a few), which are verifiable. The film meets all the guidelines from Wikipedia's film guidelines. If you want to remove blog resources, that is fine, but published, verifiable sources, such as the national publication which has gone to every college in America as (the Harbrace Guide to Writing) for study in college classes, is a verifiable source as well. Thanks. Also, there are enough extremely notable names to waive the verifiable resource condition per Wikipedia guidelines as stated. It passes notability guidelines by the famous people involved, if the verifiable sources are not enough (which they should be per wikipedia guidelines themselves.) Also Wikipedia clearly states that films are a case by case basis and the rules should be weighted on various aspects of notability, not just on published, Wikipedia deemed verifiable sources. But nonetheless, there is enough published sources to verify (hard copy published sources, and not just 'blog' sources). Thanks. {{unsigned|Atafirst|05:38, 20 March 2014}} ==Wassy24== FWIW, also a probable sock of [[User:Arindamb6]] <font face="chiller"><font color="red"><b>[[User:Jimfbleak|Jimfbleak]] - </b></font></font><font face="arial"><font color="green">[[User talk:Jimfbleak| talk to me?]]</font></font> 08:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC) *Ooh- good catch! I'll tag it accordingly. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 08:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == March 2014 == [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=600445889 your edit] to [[Antonio Pio Saracino]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Antonio Pio Saracino|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}&section=new my operator's talk page]. :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: *<nowiki>*2007: ''New Generation of European Art'' (</nowiki>{{red|'''&#91;'''}}<nowiki>useum of Contemporary Art, La Centrale Electrique in [[Brussels]], [[Belgium]])</nowiki> It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 13:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == ァぜの声 == 分かりました。私は、「web host」としてウィキペディアの使用を停止します。とても素敵であること、ありがとうございます。また、私は英語を話さないように私を理解していただきありがとうございます。^o^ [[User:AlliGloss|AlliGloss]] ([[User talk:AlliGloss|talk]]) 15:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == Fatz == I don't actually know if Fatz is notable or not; I was just fixing the capitalization. Feel free to PROD or nominate it for deletion. :) [[User:Trivialist|Trivialist]] ([[User talk:Trivialist|talk]]) 15:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == A barnstar for you! == {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Special Barnstar Hires.png|100px]] |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | In recognition for your hard work over the years :) We certainly haven't crossed our paths before, but I've always seen you do wonderful work on Wikipedia! You seem to be very kind and helpful to everyone here, specially to the new users which is a great quality every editor should have. I look forward to learn many useful things from you in the future :) Best wishes. '''-[[User:TheGeneralUser|<font color="Navy">TheGeneralUser</font>]] [[User talk:TheGeneralUser|<font color="Navy">(talk)</font>]]''' 20:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC) |} == Deleted WWE PPV template == ''06:52, 22 March 2014 Tokyogirl79 (talk | contribs) deleted page Template:Wrestling Pay-per-views (I don't see the point of this template. It's broken, and there are already similar templates like Template:Infobox Wrestling event, Template:WWEPPV and Template:TNAPPV. There's no other purpose this template could fulfill)'' Hi. Can you undelete my template please? It serves a completely different purpose than Template:Infobox Wrestling event and Template:WWEPPV, I don't see how it was "broken". It needed some major improvement, but it wasn't broken. This has made the WCW PPV list revert back to just listing the branding of their events, rather than having the complete list, which most people found more useful. Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Paradox295|Paradox295]] ([[User talk:Paradox295|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paradox295|contribs]]) 11:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Thank you for the info== I wanted to thank you for the information and help with the article I posted. I will work on everything recommended and hope to have much more feedback. Thank you, [[User:BrendonPorter|BrendonPorter]] ([[User talk:BrendonPorter|talk]]) 15:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC) == Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games == Hi. Thanks for deleting [[Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games]]. Could you also delete [[Template:Editnotices/Page/Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games]] for the same reason ([[WP:CSD#G6]])? Edit notices are automatically fully protected by the wiki software, so I tagged the editnotice for speedy deletion on the talk page instead. Thanks! [[User:Mz7|Mz7]] ([[User talk:Mz7|talk]]) 16:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC) {{You've got mail}} == The Special Barnstar == {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:alt|alt|[[File:Special Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]|[[File:SpecialBarnstar.png|100px]]}} |rowspan="2" | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | [[File:HappLand!.jpg|left|150px]] Each time I poke my head into a conversation nowadays all I see are Gnomes and Tag Monsters, it seems like a scary, unhelpful place sometimes. But you make me realize there are still unicorns! Thank you for both noticing me and helping me, the page will be much better now because of your experience. [[User:Zanglazor|Zanglazor]] ([[User talk:Zanglazor|talk]]) 16:59, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |} == [[Arathorn,son of Arador‎]] == Hi Tokyogirl, it has been a while, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Fucilla|maybe this?]], I hope you're well. I redirected the above to [[Rangers of the North#Arathorn II]] per [[WP:2R]], have a look and see if it's good. Had I had the tools, I would have moved it to [[Arathorn, son of Arador‎]] without leaving a redirect. Best, <font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:Sam Sailor|Sam Sailor]] ''[[User talk:Sam Sailor|<sup>Sing</sup>]]''</font> 09:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC) == A barnstar for you! == {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:alt|alt|[[File:Copyeditor Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]| [[File:CopyeditorStar7.PNG]]}} |rowspan="2" | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Great work in improving and sourcing the '''''[[Malenka]]''''' article! [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 15:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC) |} == [[Cellphone spying]] == I completely understand why this had to be deleted. Requesting userfication to [[User:Northamerica1000/Cellphone spying]], whereupon I would work on the article and then republish it. It's a [[WP:N|notable]] topic to be sure, and I performed some work on the deleted version. It would be nice to have this as a blue-linked article, rather than red-linked. Please respond at your convenience, and thank you for your consideration. [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 06:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC) *Done! [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 07:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC) :{{thank you}} for the prompt reply and action. [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 07:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC) ::Now created as a new article: see [[Cellphone surveillance]]. [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 21:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC) ==Thank you== I really appreciate the keep for The Company Man wiki page. Total novice wiki editor here. Also, I live in Japan - Love the user name.[[User:Pizzamancer|Pizzamancer]] ([[User talk:Pizzamancer|talk]]) 13:11, 1 March 2014 (UTC) ==Thank you== Thanks Tokyogirl79: I wrote to that student right away that he is not supposed to create the article without making sure all is fixed (syntaxwise) etc. I guess someone deleted his article this morning. My guideline says they are supposed to work on it in the sandbox until they are ready to post. I am not sure I understand the route you suggest. If you could elaborate, I'd appreciate it. [[User:BerikG|BerikG]] ([[User talk:BerikG|talk]]) 19:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC) == Category move request == Hi - I'm asking you as a friendly admin as I think this may be something only an admin can do. I created the category [[:Category:Dominican fashion designers]], then realised after I'd added it to the Dominica category, that all other categories say "Dominica #occupation" - Would it be possible to move the category to the uniform spelling please? Thank you so much. [[User:Mabalu|Mabalu]] ([[User talk:Mabalu|talk]]) 18:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC) ==Talkback== {{talkback|Northamerica1000|Moved!|ts=22:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC)}} [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 22:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC) == Talkback == {{tb|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Den (film)}} == [[:Antonio Pio Saracino]] == Hello, I am an admin on Commons from Italy and for this reason I chose for the business to be handled by some native speaker. I see you did a good job on the mentioned article, though I'm afraid that the subject lacks of notability but it might just be my impression... We never heard of this architect, which sounds weird to me as Italian architects who are successful abroad like i.e. [[Renzo Piano]], [[Gae Aulenti]], and others, are vastily publicized in our country :-) -- '''[[user:Blackcat|<span style="font-family:Bookman Old Style,Palatino Linotype,Times New Roman;font-size:8pt;color:#C00000">SERGIO</span>]]''' [[User talk:Blackcat|<span style="font-family:Bookman Old Style,Palatino Linotype,Times New Roman;font-size:8pt;color:#000000">aka '''the Black Cat''']]</span> 23:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC) *I'll send you an e-mail. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 11:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC) == Belle Knox AfD talk page == Was blanking and protection the right move, especially given that [[WP:INVOLVED|you contributed to the original discussion]]? I don't see why anything on the talk page was inappropriate. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 16:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC) :I honestly think that blanking and protecting the page was in fact the wrong move. It sends the message that Wikipedia is not a place for open discussion. [[User:Webwarlock|Web Warlock]] ([[User talk:Webwarlock|talk]]) 22:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC) *I was involved, but the thing is that the end result would have been the same regardless of which admin was brought in to blank and protect the page. You could always contest the page being protected, but other than my getting a possible warning the end result will be the same. The difference between an AfD page and the talk page of an article in the mainspace is that the AfD's talk page is meant to remain blank. It isn't supposed to be used as a talk page to discuss an article's deletion, the article itself (or the lack thereof), or to protest the deletion. The proper place to discuss any potential re-creation of the article is [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|here]] at deletion review. However I do want to say that it was discussed and the decision was to keep the page deleted, so it's unlikely that the article's history will be reverted. We do want open discussion, but we're not a forum. Open discussion should be limited to articles that are currently on Wikipedia and for articles that have a chance of passing our notability guidelines. The article on Belle Knox failed at AfD and failed deletion review. You could probably discuss the page further on someone's talk page but not at the AfD talk page. To be honest, the discussion on there wasn't particularly helpful and was mostly people complaining about how they couldn't use her real name or celebrating that the page was deleted. I didn't see that discussion as being particularly helpful in general (and again, AfD talk pages are supposed to remain blank) and it was mostly being used as a general forum, which is against Wikipedia's guidelines per [[WP:NOT#FORUM]]. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 04:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC) ::I don't think this rises to the level that I want to contest it and create drama; I'm just registering my disagreement. I share your assessment of the quality of the conversation that was occurring, but I don't see that by itself as justification for ending it unilaterally. I'm not aware of any policy or guideline that says AfD talk pages should remain blank, and the spirit of [[WP:TPO]] seems to be against it. [[WP:NOT#FORUM]] exists to keep talk pages focused on the encyclopedia. This is the first time I've seen it interpreted to prevent discussion of Wikipedia procedure. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 07:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC) *The basic consensus has always been that talk pages of AfD were to remain blank. The problem is basically that while the AfD is running, it shouldn't be used because it would create a fork of content and could be confusing while it's open. After the discussion has been closed, the only other appropriate place to discuss the article is at deletion review or on someone's talk page. Basically there's no reason for a discussion to be on an AfD's talk page. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 07:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC) :*I am actively trying to get this codified because it's one of those rules that has always existed but never been expressly written down in detail, partially because nobody really expects there to be discussion on the page after the AfD ends and all talk is moved to the main page if the AfD is open. Protecting the page would have been inevitable, so I figured why draw it out and have a ton of drama when it could be ended right then and there - especially since it'd likely end up becoming identical to the discussion we had on the article's talk page (which necessitated it being protected as well)? [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 08:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC) :*I've re-added it per someone else's recommendation, but I'm leaving it protected. We could argue that it could remain open as a discussion for the page, but the page has been deleted and by all accounts the conversation was mostly people using it as a way to make swipes against Knox or against the general deletion consensus. I mean, I understand the frustration on both sides but the conversation was going downhill at a fairly rapid rate and would have required a page protection eventually. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 08:18, 1 April 2014 (UTC) ==MfD nomination of [[User:Tokyogirl79]]== [[User:Tokyogirl79]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tokyogirl79 ]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[User:Tokyogirl79]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> [[User:Mkdw|<span style="font-size: 13px arial; color: #3366FF;">Mkdw</span>]][[User talk:Mkdw|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 16:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC) == AFD talk pages == AFD talk pages are rarely useful, but they are useful. I've used them for "live" AFDs when there is a "meta" issue that isn't part of the AFD and isn't relevant to the outcome of the AFD, but which needs to be recorded and closely associated with the AFD for some reason. I've also used them to copy information that would normally be put on the article's talk page such as possibly-useful references, in case the result will be "delete, without prejudice for a new version being created." I've used them for closed AFDs when there is important information which needs to be kept with the AFD for historical reasons. One example would be if an article about the same topic but under a different name had its own AFD - it's important to put cross-links in BOTH AFDs so if it comes up a 3rd time both will be easy to find. I've created at least 7 such pages since December 2013 and more before then. Of the 7 ([[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Willie Jerome Manning|1]], [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Frank Gruber (entrepreneur)|2]], [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of companies with spelling mistakes in their names|3]] (a joke edit), [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Exterran Holdings, Inc|4]] (a post-close edit), [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pioneers of Alaska|5]], [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pheed|6]], and [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Joyous Celebration|7]]) you could argue that in some cases I should have put the content on the AFD itself. However, I can't think of any plausible alternative for edits like #4. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])</small></small> 20:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC) == Re: List of candidates in the Indian general election, 2014 == Hi. What was the rationale for the deletion of [[List of candidates in the Indian general election, 2014]]? I was off Wikipedia for a few days, perhaps I missed something, but I didn't see any deletion discussion anywhere. Thanks, --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 16:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
'{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} {{archive banner}} == Thank you == thank you for deleting my page [[User:Skpstephen|Stephen]] ([[User talk:Skpstephen|talk]]) 11:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC) *No problem! [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 12:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == Thanks == Well, you were correct. The "Average Homeboy" page has been deleted through an AfD.. Myself and others have written articles about "Average Homeboy." Even though, many credible references have been sited in these articles, the pages have been deleted. I would greatly appreciate any kind of suggestions or assistance that you could lend on how to prevent a legitimate article from deletion. Sincerely, [[User:Rayhazen |Rayhazen ]] <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rayhazen|Rayhazen]] ([[User talk:Rayhazen|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rayhazen|contribs]]) 00:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> *You can always argue the point for [[Average Homeboy]] at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]], as the page did have more sourcing than some of the prior pages did and the text was not substantially the same. I don't necessarily know that it would have passed notability guidelines if it'd run through an additional AfD, but I do think that it was different enough to warrant another discussion. I'll broach the subject with the other editor that deleted the page. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 03:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC) *It looks like it was speedy deleted, not run through another AfD, so you could always argue against that at deletion review since the article's content and sourcing was fairly different from the version deleted at AfD. In any case, it all really boils down to coverage over a long period of time. I can actually see where you could argue for inclusion since the coverage has been over a relatively wide span of time, but I can see where others might argue otherwise as well. Deletion review is probably the best place for this. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 03:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC) ==Regarding your Yellow Wallpaper Deletion== There are published sources referenced at the bottom of the page. Newspapers and magazine (Pennyblood Magazine and Tolucan Times Newspaper to name a few), which are verifiable. The film meets all the guidelines from Wikipedia's film guidelines. If you want to remove blog resources, that is fine, but published, verifiable sources, such as the national publication which has gone to every college in America as (the Harbrace Guide to Writing) for study in college classes, is a verifiable source as well. Thanks. Also, there are enough extremely notable names to waive the verifiable resource condition per Wikipedia guidelines as stated. It passes notability guidelines by the famous people involved, if the verifiable sources are not enough (which they should be per wikipedia guidelines themselves.) Also Wikipedia clearly states that films are a case by case basis and the rules should be weighted on various aspects of notability, not just on published, Wikipedia deemed verifiable sources. But nonetheless, there is enough published sources to verify (hard copy published sources, and not just 'blog' sources). Thanks. {{unsigned|Atafirst|05:38, 20 March 2014}} ==Wassy24== FWIW, also a probable sock of [[User:Arindamb6]] <font face="chiller"><font color="red"><b>[[User:Jimfbleak|Jimfbleak]] - </b></font></font><font face="arial"><font color="green">[[User talk:Jimfbleak| talk to me?]]</font></font> 08:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC) *Ooh- good catch! I'll tag it accordingly. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 08:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == March 2014 == [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=600445889 your edit] to [[Antonio Pio Saracino]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Antonio Pio Saracino|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}&section=new my operator's talk page]. :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: *<nowiki>*2007: ''New Generation of European Art'' (</nowiki>{{red|'''&#91;'''}}<nowiki>useum of Contemporary Art, La Centrale Electrique in [[Brussels]], [[Belgium]])</nowiki> It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 13:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == ァぜの声 == 分かりました。私は、「web host」としてウィキペディアの使用を停止します。とても素敵であること、ありがとうございます。また、私は英語を話さないように私を理解していただきありがとうございます。^o^ [[User:AlliGloss|AlliGloss]] ([[User talk:AlliGloss|talk]]) 15:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == Fatz == I don't actually know if Fatz is notable or not; I was just fixing the capitalization. Feel free to PROD or nominate it for deletion. :) [[User:Trivialist|Trivialist]] ([[User talk:Trivialist|talk]]) 15:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == A barnstar for you! == {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Special Barnstar Hires.png|100px]] |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | In recognition for your hard work over the years :) We certainly haven't crossed our paths before, but I've always seen you do wonderful work on Wikipedia! You seem to be very kind and helpful to everyone here, specially to the new users which is a great quality every editor should have. I look forward to learn many useful things from you in the future :) Best wishes. '''-[[User:TheGeneralUser|<font color="Navy">TheGeneralUser</font>]] [[User talk:TheGeneralUser|<font color="Navy">(talk)</font>]]''' 20:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC) |} == Deleted WWE PPV template == ''06:52, 22 March 2014 Tokyogirl79 (talk | contribs) deleted page Template:Wrestling Pay-per-views (I don't see the point of this template. It's broken, and there are already similar templates like Template:Infobox Wrestling event, Template:WWEPPV and Template:TNAPPV. There's no other purpose this template could fulfill)'' Hi. Can you undelete my template please? It serves a completely different purpose than Template:Infobox Wrestling event and Template:WWEPPV, I don't see how it was "broken". It needed some major improvement, but it wasn't broken. This has made the WCW PPV list revert back to just listing the branding of their events, rather than having the complete list, which most people found more useful. Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Paradox295|Paradox295]] ([[User talk:Paradox295|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paradox295|contribs]]) 11:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Thank you for the info== I wanted to thank you for the information and help with the article I posted. I will work on everything recommended and hope to have much more feedback. Thank you, [[User:BrendonPorter|BrendonPorter]] ([[User talk:BrendonPorter|talk]]) 15:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC) == Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games == Hi. Thanks for deleting [[Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games]]. Could you also delete [[Template:Editnotices/Page/Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games]] for the same reason ([[WP:CSD#G6]])? Edit notices are automatically fully protected by the wiki software, so I tagged the editnotice for speedy deletion on the talk page instead. Thanks! [[User:Mz7|Mz7]] ([[User talk:Mz7|talk]]) 16:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC) {{You've got mail}} == The Special Barnstar == {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:alt|alt|[[File:Special Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]|[[File:SpecialBarnstar.png|100px]]}} |rowspan="2" | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | [[File:HappLand!.jpg|left|150px]] Each time I poke my head into a conversation nowadays all I see are Gnomes and Tag Monsters, it seems like a scary, unhelpful place sometimes. But you make me realize there are still unicorns! Thank you for both noticing me and helping me, the page will be much better now because of your experience. [[User:Zanglazor|Zanglazor]] ([[User talk:Zanglazor|talk]]) 16:59, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |} == [[Arathorn,son of Arador‎]] == Hi Tokyogirl, it has been a while, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Fucilla|maybe this?]], I hope you're well. I redirected the above to [[Rangers of the North#Arathorn II]] per [[WP:2R]], have a look and see if it's good. Had I had the tools, I would have moved it to [[Arathorn, son of Arador‎]] without leaving a redirect. Best, <font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:Sam Sailor|Sam Sailor]] ''[[User talk:Sam Sailor|<sup>Sing</sup>]]''</font> 09:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC) == A barnstar for you! == {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:alt|alt|[[File:Copyeditor Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]| [[File:CopyeditorStar7.PNG]]}} |rowspan="2" | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Great work in improving and sourcing the '''''[[Malenka]]''''' article! [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 15:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC) |} == [[Cellphone spying]] == I completely understand why this had to be deleted. Requesting userfication to [[User:Northamerica1000/Cellphone spying]], whereupon I would work on the article and then republish it. It's a [[WP:N|notable]] topic to be sure, and I performed some work on the deleted version. It would be nice to have this as a blue-linked article, rather than red-linked. Please respond at your convenience, and thank you for your consideration. [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 06:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC) *Done! [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 07:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC) :{{thank you}} for the prompt reply and action. [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 07:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC) ::Now created as a new article: see [[Cellphone surveillance]]. [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 21:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC) ==Thank you== I really appreciate the keep for The Company Man wiki page. Total novice wiki editor here. Also, I live in Japan - Love the user name.[[User:Pizzamancer|Pizzamancer]] ([[User talk:Pizzamancer|talk]]) 13:11, 1 March 2014 (UTC) ==Thank you== Thanks Tokyogirl79: I wrote to that student right away that he is not supposed to create the article without making sure all is fixed (syntaxwise) etc. I guess someone deleted his article this morning. My guideline says they are supposed to work on it in the sandbox until they are ready to post. I am not sure I understand the route you suggest. If you could elaborate, I'd appreciate it. [[User:BerikG|BerikG]] ([[User talk:BerikG|talk]]) 19:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC) == Category move request == Hi - I'm asking you as a friendly admin as I think this may be something only an admin can do. I created the category [[:Category:Dominican fashion designers]], then realised after I'd added it to the Dominica category, that all other categories say "Dominica #occupation" - Would it be possible to move the category to the uniform spelling please? Thank you so much. [[User:Mabalu|Mabalu]] ([[User talk:Mabalu|talk]]) 18:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC) ==Talkback== {{talkback|Northamerica1000|Moved!|ts=22:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC)}} [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 22:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC) == Talkback == {{tb|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Den (film)}} == [[:Antonio Pio Saracino]] == Hello, I am an admin on Commons from Italy and for this reason I chose for the business to be handled by some native speaker. I see you did a good job on the mentioned article, though I'm afraid that the subject lacks of notability but it might just be my impression... We never heard of this architect, which sounds weird to me as Italian architects who are successful abroad like i.e. [[Renzo Piano]], [[Gae Aulenti]], and others, are vastily publicized in our country :-) -- '''[[user:Blackcat|<span style="font-family:Bookman Old Style,Palatino Linotype,Times New Roman;font-size:8pt;color:#C00000">SERGIO</span>]]''' [[User talk:Blackcat|<span style="font-family:Bookman Old Style,Palatino Linotype,Times New Roman;font-size:8pt;color:#000000">aka '''the Black Cat''']]</span> 23:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC) *I'll send you an e-mail. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 11:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC) == Belle Knox AfD talk page == Was blanking and protection the right move, especially given that [[WP:INVOLVED|you contributed to the original discussion]]? I don't see why anything on the talk page was inappropriate. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 16:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC) :I honestly think that blanking and protecting the page was in fact the wrong move. It sends the message that Wikipedia is not a place for open discussion. [[User:Webwarlock|Web Warlock]] ([[User talk:Webwarlock|talk]]) 22:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC) *I was involved, but the thing is that the end result would have been the same regardless of which admin was brought in to blank and protect the page. You could always contest the page being protected, but other than my getting a possible warning the end result will be the same. The difference between an AfD page and the talk page of an article in the mainspace is that the AfD's talk page is meant to remain blank. It isn't supposed to be used as a talk page to discuss an article's deletion, the article itself (or the lack thereof), or to protest the deletion. The proper place to discuss any potential re-creation of the article is [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|here]] at deletion review. However I do want to say that it was discussed and the decision was to keep the page deleted, so it's unlikely that the article's history will be reverted. We do want open discussion, but we're not a forum. Open discussion should be limited to articles that are currently on Wikipedia and for articles that have a chance of passing our notability guidelines. The article on Belle Knox failed at AfD and failed deletion review. You could probably discuss the page further on someone's talk page but not at the AfD talk page. To be honest, the discussion on there wasn't particularly helpful and was mostly people complaining about how they couldn't use her real name or celebrating that the page was deleted. I didn't see that discussion as being particularly helpful in general (and again, AfD talk pages are supposed to remain blank) and it was mostly being used as a general forum, which is against Wikipedia's guidelines per [[WP:NOT#FORUM]]. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 04:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC) ::I don't think this rises to the level that I want to contest it and create drama; I'm just registering my disagreement. I share your assessment of the quality of the conversation that was occurring, but I don't see that by itself as justification for ending it unilaterally. I'm not aware of any policy or guideline that says AfD talk pages should remain blank, and the spirit of [[WP:TPO]] seems to be against it. [[WP:NOT#FORUM]] exists to keep talk pages focused on the encyclopedia. This is the first time I've seen it interpreted to prevent discussion of Wikipedia procedure. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 07:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC) *The basic consensus has always been that talk pages of AfD were to remain blank. The problem is basically that while the AfD is running, it shouldn't be used because it would create a fork of content and could be confusing while it's open. After the discussion has been closed, the only other appropriate place to discuss the article is at deletion review or on someone's talk page. Basically there's no reason for a discussion to be on an AfD's talk page. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 07:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC) :*I am actively trying to get this codified because it's one of those rules that has always existed but never been expressly written down in detail, partially because nobody really expects there to be discussion on the page after the AfD ends and all talk is moved to the main page if the AfD is open. Protecting the page would have been inevitable, so I figured why draw it out and have a ton of drama when it could be ended right then and there - especially since it'd likely end up becoming identical to the discussion we had on the article's talk page (which necessitated it being protected as well)? [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 08:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC) :*I've re-added it per someone else's recommendation, but I'm leaving it protected. We could argue that it could remain open as a discussion for the page, but the page has been deleted and by all accounts the conversation was mostly people using it as a way to make swipes against Knox or against the general deletion consensus. I mean, I understand the frustration on both sides but the conversation was going downhill at a fairly rapid rate and would have required a page protection eventually. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 08:18, 1 April 2014 (UTC) ==MfD nomination of [[User:Tokyogirl79]]== [[User:Tokyogirl79]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tokyogirl79 ]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[User:Tokyogirl79]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> [[User:Mkdw|<span style="font-size: 13px arial; color: #3366FF;">Mkdw</span>]][[User talk:Mkdw|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 16:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC) == AFD talk pages == AFD talk pages are rarely useful, but they are useful. I've used them for "live" AFDs when there is a "meta" issue that isn't part of the AFD and isn't relevant to the outcome of the AFD, but which needs to be recorded and closely associated with the AFD for some reason. I've also used them to copy information that would normally be put on the article's talk page such as possibly-useful references, in case the result will be "delete, without prejudice for a new version being created." I've used them for closed AFDs when there is important information which needs to be kept with the AFD for historical reasons. One example would be if an article about the same topic but under a different name had its own AFD - it's important to put cross-links in BOTH AFDs so if it comes up a 3rd time both will be easy to find. I've created at least 7 such pages since December 2013 and more before then. Of the 7 ([[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Willie Jerome Manning|1]], [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Frank Gruber (entrepreneur)|2]], [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of companies with spelling mistakes in their names|3]] (a joke edit), [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Exterran Holdings, Inc|4]] (a post-close edit), [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pioneers of Alaska|5]], [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pheed|6]], and [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Joyous Celebration|7]]) you could argue that in some cases I should have put the content on the AFD itself. However, I can't think of any plausible alternative for edits like #4. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])</small></small> 20:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC) == Re: List of candidates in the Indian general election, 2014 == Hi. What was the rationale for the deletion of [[List of candidates in the Indian general election, 2014]]? I was off Wikipedia for a few days, perhaps I missed something, but I didn't see any deletion discussion anywhere. Thanks, --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 16:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC) == A barnstar for you! == {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Barnstar of Humour Hires.png|100px]] |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | for your good understanding of humor when closing the april fool's AFDs ~~~~ |}'
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff)
'@@ -142,3 +142,12 @@ == Re: List of candidates in the Indian general election, 2014 == Hi. What was the rationale for the deletion of [[List of candidates in the Indian general election, 2014]]? I was off Wikipedia for a few days, perhaps I missed something, but I didn't see any deletion discussion anywhere. Thanks, --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 16:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC) + +== A barnstar for you! == + +{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" +|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Barnstar of Humour Hires.png|100px]] +|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor''' +|- +|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | for your good understanding of humor when closing the april fool's AFDs ~~~~ +|} '
Unified diff of changes made by edit, pre-save transformed (edit_diff_pst)
'@@ -142,3 +142,12 @@ == Re: List of candidates in the Indian general election, 2014 == Hi. What was the rationale for the deletion of [[List of candidates in the Indian general election, 2014]]? I was off Wikipedia for a few days, perhaps I missed something, but I didn't see any deletion discussion anywhere. Thanks, --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 16:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC) + +== A barnstar for you! == + +{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" +|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Barnstar of Humour Hires.png|100px]] +|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor''' +|- +|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | for your good understanding of humor when closing the april fool's AFDs -- [[user:aunva6|Aunva6]]<sup>[[user talk:aunva6|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Aunva6|contribs]]</sup> 20:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC) +|} '
New page size (new_size)
22958
Old page size (old_size)
22525
Size change in edit (edit_delta)
433
Lines added in edit (added_lines)
[ 0 => false, 1 => '== A barnstar for you! ==', 2 => false, 3 => '{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"', 4 => '|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Barnstar of Humour Hires.png|100px]]', 5 => '|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor'''', 6 => '|-', 7 => '|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | for your good understanding of humor when closing the april fool's AFDs ~~~~', 8 => '|}' ]
New page wikitext, pre-save transformed (new_pst)
'{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} {{archive banner}} == Thank you == thank you for deleting my page [[User:Skpstephen|Stephen]] ([[User talk:Skpstephen|talk]]) 11:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC) *No problem! [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 12:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == Thanks == Well, you were correct. The "Average Homeboy" page has been deleted through an AfD.. Myself and others have written articles about "Average Homeboy." Even though, many credible references have been sited in these articles, the pages have been deleted. I would greatly appreciate any kind of suggestions or assistance that you could lend on how to prevent a legitimate article from deletion. Sincerely, [[User:Rayhazen |Rayhazen ]] <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rayhazen|Rayhazen]] ([[User talk:Rayhazen|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rayhazen|contribs]]) 00:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> *You can always argue the point for [[Average Homeboy]] at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]], as the page did have more sourcing than some of the prior pages did and the text was not substantially the same. I don't necessarily know that it would have passed notability guidelines if it'd run through an additional AfD, but I do think that it was different enough to warrant another discussion. I'll broach the subject with the other editor that deleted the page. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 03:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC) *It looks like it was speedy deleted, not run through another AfD, so you could always argue against that at deletion review since the article's content and sourcing was fairly different from the version deleted at AfD. In any case, it all really boils down to coverage over a long period of time. I can actually see where you could argue for inclusion since the coverage has been over a relatively wide span of time, but I can see where others might argue otherwise as well. Deletion review is probably the best place for this. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 03:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC) ==Regarding your Yellow Wallpaper Deletion== There are published sources referenced at the bottom of the page. Newspapers and magazine (Pennyblood Magazine and Tolucan Times Newspaper to name a few), which are verifiable. The film meets all the guidelines from Wikipedia's film guidelines. If you want to remove blog resources, that is fine, but published, verifiable sources, such as the national publication which has gone to every college in America as (the Harbrace Guide to Writing) for study in college classes, is a verifiable source as well. Thanks. Also, there are enough extremely notable names to waive the verifiable resource condition per Wikipedia guidelines as stated. It passes notability guidelines by the famous people involved, if the verifiable sources are not enough (which they should be per wikipedia guidelines themselves.) Also Wikipedia clearly states that films are a case by case basis and the rules should be weighted on various aspects of notability, not just on published, Wikipedia deemed verifiable sources. But nonetheless, there is enough published sources to verify (hard copy published sources, and not just 'blog' sources). Thanks. {{unsigned|Atafirst|05:38, 20 March 2014}} ==Wassy24== FWIW, also a probable sock of [[User:Arindamb6]] <font face="chiller"><font color="red"><b>[[User:Jimfbleak|Jimfbleak]] - </b></font></font><font face="arial"><font color="green">[[User talk:Jimfbleak| talk to me?]]</font></font> 08:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC) *Ooh- good catch! I'll tag it accordingly. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 08:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == March 2014 == [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=600445889 your edit] to [[Antonio Pio Saracino]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Antonio Pio Saracino|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}&section=new my operator's talk page]. :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: *<nowiki>*2007: ''New Generation of European Art'' (</nowiki>{{red|'''&#91;'''}}<nowiki>useum of Contemporary Art, La Centrale Electrique in [[Brussels]], [[Belgium]])</nowiki> It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 13:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == ァぜの声 == 分かりました。私は、「web host」としてウィキペディアの使用を停止します。とても素敵であること、ありがとうございます。また、私は英語を話さないように私を理解していただきありがとうございます。^o^ [[User:AlliGloss|AlliGloss]] ([[User talk:AlliGloss|talk]]) 15:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == Fatz == I don't actually know if Fatz is notable or not; I was just fixing the capitalization. Feel free to PROD or nominate it for deletion. :) [[User:Trivialist|Trivialist]] ([[User talk:Trivialist|talk]]) 15:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC) == A barnstar for you! == {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Special Barnstar Hires.png|100px]] |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | In recognition for your hard work over the years :) We certainly haven't crossed our paths before, but I've always seen you do wonderful work on Wikipedia! You seem to be very kind and helpful to everyone here, specially to the new users which is a great quality every editor should have. I look forward to learn many useful things from you in the future :) Best wishes. '''-[[User:TheGeneralUser|<font color="Navy">TheGeneralUser</font>]] [[User talk:TheGeneralUser|<font color="Navy">(talk)</font>]]''' 20:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC) |} == Deleted WWE PPV template == ''06:52, 22 March 2014 Tokyogirl79 (talk | contribs) deleted page Template:Wrestling Pay-per-views (I don't see the point of this template. It's broken, and there are already similar templates like Template:Infobox Wrestling event, Template:WWEPPV and Template:TNAPPV. There's no other purpose this template could fulfill)'' Hi. Can you undelete my template please? It serves a completely different purpose than Template:Infobox Wrestling event and Template:WWEPPV, I don't see how it was "broken". It needed some major improvement, but it wasn't broken. This has made the WCW PPV list revert back to just listing the branding of their events, rather than having the complete list, which most people found more useful. Thanks. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Paradox295|Paradox295]] ([[User talk:Paradox295|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Paradox295|contribs]]) 11:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Thank you for the info== I wanted to thank you for the information and help with the article I posted. I will work on everything recommended and hope to have much more feedback. Thank you, [[User:BrendonPorter|BrendonPorter]] ([[User talk:BrendonPorter|talk]]) 15:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC) == Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games == Hi. Thanks for deleting [[Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games]]. Could you also delete [[Template:Editnotices/Page/Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games]] for the same reason ([[WP:CSD#G6]])? Edit notices are automatically fully protected by the wiki software, so I tagged the editnotice for speedy deletion on the talk page instead. Thanks! [[User:Mz7|Mz7]] ([[User talk:Mz7|talk]]) 16:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC) {{You've got mail}} == The Special Barnstar == {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:alt|alt|[[File:Special Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]|[[File:SpecialBarnstar.png|100px]]}} |rowspan="2" | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | [[File:HappLand!.jpg|left|150px]] Each time I poke my head into a conversation nowadays all I see are Gnomes and Tag Monsters, it seems like a scary, unhelpful place sometimes. But you make me realize there are still unicorns! Thank you for both noticing me and helping me, the page will be much better now because of your experience. [[User:Zanglazor|Zanglazor]] ([[User talk:Zanglazor|talk]]) 16:59, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |} == [[Arathorn,son of Arador‎]] == Hi Tokyogirl, it has been a while, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Fucilla|maybe this?]], I hope you're well. I redirected the above to [[Rangers of the North#Arathorn II]] per [[WP:2R]], have a look and see if it's good. Had I had the tools, I would have moved it to [[Arathorn, son of Arador‎]] without leaving a redirect. Best, <font face="Eras Bold ITC">[[User:Sam Sailor|Sam Sailor]] ''[[User talk:Sam Sailor|<sup>Sing</sup>]]''</font> 09:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC) == A barnstar for you! == {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:alt|alt|[[File:Copyeditor Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]| [[File:CopyeditorStar7.PNG]]}} |rowspan="2" | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Great work in improving and sourcing the '''''[[Malenka]]''''' article! [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 15:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC) |} == [[Cellphone spying]] == I completely understand why this had to be deleted. Requesting userfication to [[User:Northamerica1000/Cellphone spying]], whereupon I would work on the article and then republish it. It's a [[WP:N|notable]] topic to be sure, and I performed some work on the deleted version. It would be nice to have this as a blue-linked article, rather than red-linked. Please respond at your convenience, and thank you for your consideration. [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 06:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC) *Done! [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 07:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC) :{{thank you}} for the prompt reply and action. [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 07:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC) ::Now created as a new article: see [[Cellphone surveillance]]. [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 21:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC) ==Thank you== I really appreciate the keep for The Company Man wiki page. Total novice wiki editor here. Also, I live in Japan - Love the user name.[[User:Pizzamancer|Pizzamancer]] ([[User talk:Pizzamancer|talk]]) 13:11, 1 March 2014 (UTC) ==Thank you== Thanks Tokyogirl79: I wrote to that student right away that he is not supposed to create the article without making sure all is fixed (syntaxwise) etc. I guess someone deleted his article this morning. My guideline says they are supposed to work on it in the sandbox until they are ready to post. I am not sure I understand the route you suggest. If you could elaborate, I'd appreciate it. [[User:BerikG|BerikG]] ([[User talk:BerikG|talk]]) 19:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC) == Category move request == Hi - I'm asking you as a friendly admin as I think this may be something only an admin can do. I created the category [[:Category:Dominican fashion designers]], then realised after I'd added it to the Dominica category, that all other categories say "Dominica #occupation" - Would it be possible to move the category to the uniform spelling please? Thank you so much. [[User:Mabalu|Mabalu]] ([[User talk:Mabalu|talk]]) 18:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC) ==Talkback== {{talkback|Northamerica1000|Moved!|ts=22:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC)}} [[User:Northamerica1000|NorthAmerica]]<sup>[[User_talk:Northamerica1000|1000]]</sup> 22:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC) == Talkback == {{tb|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Den (film)}} == [[:Antonio Pio Saracino]] == Hello, I am an admin on Commons from Italy and for this reason I chose for the business to be handled by some native speaker. I see you did a good job on the mentioned article, though I'm afraid that the subject lacks of notability but it might just be my impression... We never heard of this architect, which sounds weird to me as Italian architects who are successful abroad like i.e. [[Renzo Piano]], [[Gae Aulenti]], and others, are vastily publicized in our country :-) -- '''[[user:Blackcat|<span style="font-family:Bookman Old Style,Palatino Linotype,Times New Roman;font-size:8pt;color:#C00000">SERGIO</span>]]''' [[User talk:Blackcat|<span style="font-family:Bookman Old Style,Palatino Linotype,Times New Roman;font-size:8pt;color:#000000">aka '''the Black Cat''']]</span> 23:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC) *I'll send you an e-mail. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 11:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC) == Belle Knox AfD talk page == Was blanking and protection the right move, especially given that [[WP:INVOLVED|you contributed to the original discussion]]? I don't see why anything on the talk page was inappropriate. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 16:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC) :I honestly think that blanking and protecting the page was in fact the wrong move. It sends the message that Wikipedia is not a place for open discussion. [[User:Webwarlock|Web Warlock]] ([[User talk:Webwarlock|talk]]) 22:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC) *I was involved, but the thing is that the end result would have been the same regardless of which admin was brought in to blank and protect the page. You could always contest the page being protected, but other than my getting a possible warning the end result will be the same. The difference between an AfD page and the talk page of an article in the mainspace is that the AfD's talk page is meant to remain blank. It isn't supposed to be used as a talk page to discuss an article's deletion, the article itself (or the lack thereof), or to protest the deletion. The proper place to discuss any potential re-creation of the article is [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|here]] at deletion review. However I do want to say that it was discussed and the decision was to keep the page deleted, so it's unlikely that the article's history will be reverted. We do want open discussion, but we're not a forum. Open discussion should be limited to articles that are currently on Wikipedia and for articles that have a chance of passing our notability guidelines. The article on Belle Knox failed at AfD and failed deletion review. You could probably discuss the page further on someone's talk page but not at the AfD talk page. To be honest, the discussion on there wasn't particularly helpful and was mostly people complaining about how they couldn't use her real name or celebrating that the page was deleted. I didn't see that discussion as being particularly helpful in general (and again, AfD talk pages are supposed to remain blank) and it was mostly being used as a general forum, which is against Wikipedia's guidelines per [[WP:NOT#FORUM]]. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 04:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC) ::I don't think this rises to the level that I want to contest it and create drama; I'm just registering my disagreement. I share your assessment of the quality of the conversation that was occurring, but I don't see that by itself as justification for ending it unilaterally. I'm not aware of any policy or guideline that says AfD talk pages should remain blank, and the spirit of [[WP:TPO]] seems to be against it. [[WP:NOT#FORUM]] exists to keep talk pages focused on the encyclopedia. This is the first time I've seen it interpreted to prevent discussion of Wikipedia procedure. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 07:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC) *The basic consensus has always been that talk pages of AfD were to remain blank. The problem is basically that while the AfD is running, it shouldn't be used because it would create a fork of content and could be confusing while it's open. After the discussion has been closed, the only other appropriate place to discuss the article is at deletion review or on someone's talk page. Basically there's no reason for a discussion to be on an AfD's talk page. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 07:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC) :*I am actively trying to get this codified because it's one of those rules that has always existed but never been expressly written down in detail, partially because nobody really expects there to be discussion on the page after the AfD ends and all talk is moved to the main page if the AfD is open. Protecting the page would have been inevitable, so I figured why draw it out and have a ton of drama when it could be ended right then and there - especially since it'd likely end up becoming identical to the discussion we had on the article's talk page (which necessitated it being protected as well)? [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 08:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC) :*I've re-added it per someone else's recommendation, but I'm leaving it protected. We could argue that it could remain open as a discussion for the page, but the page has been deleted and by all accounts the conversation was mostly people using it as a way to make swipes against Knox or against the general deletion consensus. I mean, I understand the frustration on both sides but the conversation was going downhill at a fairly rapid rate and would have required a page protection eventually. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[user talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style='color: #19197;background-color: #FFFFFF;'> (。◕‿◕。)</span>''']] 08:18, 1 April 2014 (UTC) ==MfD nomination of [[User:Tokyogirl79]]== [[User:Tokyogirl79]], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tokyogirl79 ]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[User:Tokyogirl79]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> [[User:Mkdw|<span style="font-size: 13px arial; color: #3366FF;">Mkdw</span>]][[User talk:Mkdw|<sup>''talk''</sup>]] 16:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC) == AFD talk pages == AFD talk pages are rarely useful, but they are useful. I've used them for "live" AFDs when there is a "meta" issue that isn't part of the AFD and isn't relevant to the outcome of the AFD, but which needs to be recorded and closely associated with the AFD for some reason. I've also used them to copy information that would normally be put on the article's talk page such as possibly-useful references, in case the result will be "delete, without prejudice for a new version being created." I've used them for closed AFDs when there is important information which needs to be kept with the AFD for historical reasons. One example would be if an article about the same topic but under a different name had its own AFD - it's important to put cross-links in BOTH AFDs so if it comes up a 3rd time both will be easy to find. I've created at least 7 such pages since December 2013 and more before then. Of the 7 ([[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Willie Jerome Manning|1]], [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Frank Gruber (entrepreneur)|2]], [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of companies with spelling mistakes in their names|3]] (a joke edit), [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Exterran Holdings, Inc|4]] (a post-close edit), [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pioneers of Alaska|5]], [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Pheed|6]], and [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Joyous Celebration|7]]) you could argue that in some cases I should have put the content on the AFD itself. However, I can't think of any plausible alternative for edits like #4. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])</small></small> 20:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC) == Re: List of candidates in the Indian general election, 2014 == Hi. What was the rationale for the deletion of [[List of candidates in the Indian general election, 2014]]? I was off Wikipedia for a few days, perhaps I missed something, but I didn't see any deletion discussion anywhere. Thanks, --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 16:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC) == A barnstar for you! == {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Barnstar of Humour Hires.png|100px]] |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor''' |- |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | for your good understanding of humor when closing the april fool's AFDs -- [[user:aunva6|Aunva6]]<sup>[[user talk:aunva6|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Aunva6|contribs]]</sup> 20:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC) |}'
Whether or not the change was made through a Tor exit node (tor_exit_node)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1396471524