User contributions for Goodtablemanners
A user with 1,274 edits. Account created on 9 March 2021.
10 July 2024
- 17:4717:47, 10 July 2024 diff hist +10 Sophia Yan Apparently continues to work for them. current
- 17:4117:41, 10 July 2024 diff hist −76 Sophia Yan Undid revision 1233570232 by Valjean (talk) Changes by Valjean were unhelpful. The article is about Yan, not the Daily Telegraph which is mentioned only incidentally. "Conservative" and "right-wing" are not synonyms any more than "Liberal" and "left-wing". "The "right-wing" description here smacks of WP:Coatrack. Tag: Undo
9 July 2024
- 18:1418:14, 9 July 2024 diff hist −74 Sophia Yan "Right-wing" description of the Daily Telegraph is unsourced. The newspaper is described as "conservative" in its own article.
28 June 2024
- 17:2717:27, 28 June 2024 diff hist −5 Crisis pregnancy center →Activities: "Even" is unnecessary.
27 June 2024
- 16:4416:44, 27 June 2024 diff hist −84 Crisis pregnancy center The factual information can stand by itself. Stating categorically that the centers "deceive women" is pejorative POV that can only be used if the source is named in the text. Misinformation is normally described as deception only when its source clearly knows the truth but deliberately falsifies it.
24 June 2024
- 19:0119:01, 24 June 2024 diff hist +814 Talk:Crisis pregnancy center →"CPCs deceive pregnant women...": new section Tag: New topic
- 18:0818:08, 24 June 2024 diff hist +6 Crisis pregnancy center Modified previous blanket statement. Some centers are probably upfront about what they are trying to do, and no doubt lots of women go to CPCs knowing what's in store. Tag: Reverted
3 June 2024
- 19:3819:38, 3 June 2024 diff hist −168 Crisis pregnancy center Removed sentence with obvious POV wording. The mere fact that a source is technically "reliable" doesn't mean we allow this kind of "manipulative" wording. The antiabortion version of this wording would be something like: "CPCs implore, influence, and guide women toward motherhood."
27 April 2024
- 11:3911:39, 27 April 2024 diff hist +343 Talk:Abortion →"One of the safest procedures in medicine"
26 April 2024
- 18:2918:29, 26 April 2024 diff hist +501 Talk:Abortion →"One of the safest procedures in medicine"
- 17:4817:48, 26 April 2024 diff hist −3 Talk:Abortion →"One of the safest procedures in medicine"
- 17:2217:22, 26 April 2024 diff hist +456 Talk:Abortion →"One of the safest procedures in medicine"
- 17:0017:00, 26 April 2024 diff hist −2 Talk:Abortion →"One of the safest procedures in medicine"
- 16:4416:44, 26 April 2024 diff hist +496 Talk:Abortion →"One of the safest procedures in medicine"
- 16:1316:13, 26 April 2024 diff hist +623 Talk:Abortion No edit summary
- 15:2915:29, 26 April 2024 diff hist +361 Talk:Abortion →"One of the safest procedures in medicine"
- 03:3403:34, 26 April 2024 diff hist +310 Talk:Abortion →"One of the safest procedures in medicine"
- 03:2003:20, 26 April 2024 diff hist +288 Talk:Abortion →"One of the safest procedures in medicine"
25 April 2024
- 21:1421:14, 25 April 2024 diff hist +539 Talk:Abortion →The lead amounts to a preemptive argument for legal abortion
- 16:4316:43, 25 April 2024 diff hist −2 Abortion Don't see where either source says it quite this way. The Lancet source, by the way, is very opinionated in its wording about things which are not "medical". Tag: Reverted
- 16:3016:30, 25 April 2024 diff hist +2 Abortion Birth timing and family size are two different things.
24 April 2024
- 20:4120:41, 24 April 2024 diff hist +645 Talk:Abortion →The lead amounts to a preemptive argument for legal abortion
- 18:0618:06, 24 April 2024 diff hist +1,367 Talk:Abortion →The lead amounts to a preemptive argument for legal abortion: new section Tag: New topic
20 April 2024
- 02:2902:29, 20 April 2024 diff hist +1 Abortion Better to list incest with rape than to have one at the beginning and one at the end of the list.
18 April 2024
- 20:1120:11, 18 April 2024 diff hist −982 David Reardon →Media coverage: Way too much weight was given to journalist Bazelon's assessment of Reardon's strategy. The article is on Reardon, not Bazelon's take on Reardon.
- 16:2716:27, 18 April 2024 diff hist +2 m Talk:Abortion →"When done legally..."
- 14:5714:57, 18 April 2024 diff hist +554 Talk:Abortion →"When done legally...": Why "done legally" is used here.
- 01:2001:20, 18 April 2024 diff hist +602 Talk:Abortion →"When done legally...": new section Tag: New topic
17 April 2024
- 17:5717:57, 17 April 2024 diff hist 0 Abortion Changed order of paragraphs in the lead section. It makes more sense to place the previously last paragraph as the second paragraph because it introduces the moral contoversy over abortion which should precede mention of the fact that it is banned or restricted in some parts of the world Tag: Reverted
16 April 2024
- 04:3704:37, 16 April 2024 diff hist −591 David Reardon →Biography: Reduced length of quotation
13 April 2024
- 14:4814:48, 13 April 2024 diff hist +414 Talk:Abortion →Selection bias
12 April 2024
- 22:2322:23, 12 April 2024 diff hist +108 Talk:Abortion →Selection bias
- 20:3920:39, 12 April 2024 diff hist +500 Talk:Abortion →Selection bias
- 19:1219:12, 12 April 2024 diff hist +589 Talk:Abortion →Reference no. 135: https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.socscimed.2019.112704
10 April 2024
- 00:2100:21, 10 April 2024 diff hist +26 Abortion Undid revision 1217769711 by Avatar317 (talk) Apples and oranges. The Longitudinal study is not an opinion poll. More to the point it is given more weight than anything else in the section, effectively being used to put the question about mental distress to bed. So giving some basic information about it is definitely in order. Tags: Undo Reverted
6 April 2024
- 17:2717:27, 6 April 2024 diff hist +26 Abortion →Mental health: No good reason not to be specific when this study is being heavily relied on in the section. Tag: Reverted
5 April 2024
- 03:2203:22, 5 April 2024 diff hist +228 Talk:The Bell Curve →Did I miss something...
- 01:4401:44, 5 April 2024 diff hist +258 Talk:The Bell Curve →"a view that is now considered discredited by mainstream science" citations are poor
4 April 2024
- 19:3519:35, 4 April 2024 diff hist −3 The Bell Curve Previous wording comes across as if the issue were scientifically settled which isn't quite the case. Tag: Reverted
- 19:1419:14, 4 April 2024 diff hist 0 Samaritan's Purse →Controversy: "Condemn"" isn't the best synonym for "disavow" which is what the source uses.
23 March 2024
- 22:0522:05, 23 March 2024 diff hist +14 Anti-abortion violence →Arson, bombing, and property crime: "Other " unnamed "topics" not important enough to include. The sentencing followed a guilty plea.
26 January 2024
- 20:4820:48, 26 January 2024 diff hist +28 J. Philippe Rushton →Race and intelligence: I think this is closer to what the sources indicate about Rushton's theory. Tag: Reverted
22 January 2024
- 20:0220:02, 22 January 2024 diff hist +265 Talk:Prisoners' rights in international law →Why just the United States?: new section Tag: New topic
- 19:5819:58, 22 January 2024 diff hist +50 Prisoners' rights in international law →United States: "American government" is too informal current
20 January 2024
- 22:5122:51, 20 January 2024 diff hist −14 Heartbeat bill Again, the word "intentionally" here is argumentative and unnecessary.
- 20:2920:29, 20 January 2024 diff hist −8 Heartbeat bill I think that the wording "proponents claim" and "fetal heartbeat" in quotation marks give ample indication that this is a very much disputed. The basis for the claim and the response by experts in human biology is given immediately after the sentence anyway.
17 January 2024
- 18:1818:18, 17 January 2024 diff hist +40 YIMBY "Pro-housing" seems unnecessarily broad to me. Most of us want people to be housed.
13 January 2024
- 20:5620:56, 13 January 2024 diff hist −140 Southern Poverty Law Center Some rewording for brevity and flow.
4 January 2024
- 18:0818:08, 4 January 2024 diff hist −62 Loyal White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan →References: Nothing in article indicates that this group is anti-abortion
12 December 2023
- 21:4521:45, 12 December 2023 diff hist +60 Lau Sing Kee →References
