User contributions for LaurenCole

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

20:3220:32, 25 January 2010 diff hist +23‎ Lists of prehistoric fish ‎No edit summary
20:3220:32, 25 January 2010 diff hist −20‎ Lists of prehistoric fish ‎No edit summary
20:2920:29, 25 January 2010 diff hist +33‎ Lists of prehistoric fish ‎No edit summary
20:2820:28, 25 January 2010 diff hist −210‎ Lists of prehistoric fish ‎ This account of lobe-finned fish evolution is incorrect
20:2520:25, 25 January 2010 diff hist +77‎ Lists of prehistoric fish ‎ Placoderms and sharks are not one category
20:1920:19, 25 January 2010 diff hist −1,021‎ Lists of prehistoric fish ‎ Placoderms are not sharks, acanthodians are not the first jawed fishes. Choanates and Crossopterygians are not valid. These statements are decades out of date and do not reflect current consensus.
19:5719:57, 25 January 2010 diff hist −178‎ Lists of prehistoric fish ‎ Removing unattributed and demonstrably false statement - there are many marine acanthodians and bony fishes from the paleozoic

23:1223:12, 25 July 2009 diff hist −560‎ Devonian ‎ Fixing incorrect and irrelevant information
23:0223:02, 25 July 2009 diff hist +3‎ Devonian ‎No edit summary
22:5922:59, 25 July 2009 diff hist +42‎ Devonian ‎No edit summary
22:5722:57, 25 July 2009 diff hist +1‎ Devonian ‎ Those are sarcopterygians

02:3302:33, 14 May 2009 diff hist −916‎ Claudius ‎ Not appropriate to the section or the article - not about Claudius, no scholarly citation

01:5001:50, 25 January 2009 diff hist 0‎ Osteichthyes ‎ forget it - it would take too much editing change the usage of osteichthyes from a paraphyletic taxonomic one to a cladistic one.
01:4801:48, 25 January 2009 diff hist +1‎ Osteichthyes ‎ tetrapods are osteichthyans too

02:2502:25, 6 December 2008 diff hist +316‎ Claudius ‎ The reference is from Levick, and while the new image may fit better, its less a less realistic and accurate portrait (compared to other images) and so should not be the representative image

23:2923:29, 3 September 2008 diff hist −124‎ Claudius ‎ redundant - the point is already made in the previous sentence. We can't know what specifically he was "warned" about.