[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

User contributions for 68.8.71.169

Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽

25 May 2021

3 October 2020

  • 07:4007:40, 3 October 2020 diff hist −477 Dan CrenshawPolitiFact is not a neutral, non biased source. Degrades the intent and value of Wikipedia. Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 07:3807:38, 3 October 2020 diff hist −965 Dan CrenshawPolitiFact is a biased source. Citing such a source degrades the integrity of Wikipedia. If you allow one, allow all contrary “fact check” websites. Logic suggests, none are allowed. Statistically, politifacts ‘rules’ 3:1 against conservatives speech. This either statistically supports conservatives are liars by nature, or, more likely, the site is biased and violates what makes Wikipedia good. Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 07:2907:29, 3 October 2020 diff hist +121 Dan CrenshawCiting a biased source because it claims to be a “fact checker”, but disallowing another biased source is unethical. Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit