User contributions for 82.13.181.124
Appearance
Results for 82.13.181.124 talk block log logs global block log filter log
6 March 2024
- 18:1718:17, 6 March 2024 diff hist +54 Jason Fox →Military service: Previously said 1992 - but on the Youtube interview cited he states at 12:00 that he joined in 2002-03
20 January 2024
- 23:5123:51, 20 January 2024 diff hist −80 Ergotism →History: Oddly worded citation adjusted. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
21 August 2023
- 17:5017:50, 21 August 2023 diff hist +347 Talk:St Stephen's Church, St Albans →Dunkeld lectern???: new section current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
4 August 2023
- 00:0300:03, 4 August 2023 diff hist +6 John Robins (comedian) corrected grammatical error
30 July 2023
- 21:0921:09, 30 July 2023 diff hist +349 Talk:Buildwas Abbey →Much too long, tedious and yet still lacks modern details.: new section Tag: New topic
14 July 2023
- 16:5616:56, 14 July 2023 diff hist −132 Eagles of Death Metal No edit summary
- 16:5516:55, 14 July 2023 diff hist −2,323 Eagles of Death Metal Removed some of the numerous bands cashing in with a mention. There's not point is saying "several artists including" and then listing them all. The two biggest artists suffice as an example. Tag: references removed
24 February 2023
- 10:2610:26, 24 February 2023 diff hist +251 Talk:List of crossings of the River Wye →Wow, that is one useless map!: new section Tag: New topic
7 February 2023
- 16:2816:28, 7 February 2023 diff hist +411 Talk:Arthur Lewis (British politician) →Semi-conductor collaboration with GDR?: new section Tag: New topic
11 January 2023
- 18:2218:22, 11 January 2023 diff hist −624 Suede (band) I removed the line about "Wild Ones being considered by some as their best song". It's meaninglessly subjective and unsupported with any evidence. EVERY song is considered by SOMEBODY to be their" best song" Tag: references removed
4 November 2022
- 22:2722:27, 4 November 2022 diff hist +5 Battle of Waterloo No edit summary
- 22:2522:25, 4 November 2022 diff hist +177 Battle of Waterloo I have removed incorrect statistics - 30,500 British troops fought at Waterloo, not 25,000, and the claim that only 7,000 of these had seen action in the Peninsula is extremely inaccurate. The source for this erroneous claim was Longford's biography of Wellington. Goodness knows where she got that figure from but it's certainly not based on research.
- 22:1422:14, 4 November 2022 diff hist 0 Talk:Mike Read →Cleanup - amount of vandalism allowed into this article is a disgrace
12 October 2022
- 17:5517:55, 12 October 2022 diff hist +251 Talk:Ashley John-Baptiste →No mention of the speech impediment?: new section Tag: New topic
31 December 2021
- 08:2108:21, 31 December 2021 diff hist +353 Talk:Johannine Comma →Basic explanation: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
31 August 2021
- 15:5515:55, 31 August 2021 diff hist +13 John Hackett (British Army officer) Made some minor punctuation and lexical changes.
- 15:5115:51, 31 August 2021 diff hist −51 John Hackett (British Army officer) Changed non-sensical sentence in order to be clearer.
- 15:4815:48, 31 August 2021 diff hist +2 John Hackett (British Army officer) No edit summary
- 15:4715:47, 31 August 2021 diff hist −37 John Hackett (British Army officer) Changed cumbersome wording to be clearer.