User contributions for 83.89.31.71
For 83.89.31.71 talk block log logs filter log
18 July 2022
- 07:0707:07, 18 July 2022 diff hist +483 User talk:83.89.31.71 →July 2022: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 07:0207:02, 18 July 2022 diff hist +163 User talk:83.89.31.71 →July 2022: Reply Tag: Reply
- 06:4606:46, 18 July 2022 diff hist +23 History of Islam →Origins of Islam: I have changed the wording to makr it reflect the fact that this is only the opinions and claims of certain scholars Tag: Reverted
- 06:3906:39, 18 July 2022 diff hist 0 History of Islam →Origins of Islam: Removed the : for a . to reflect the removal of the quote Tag: Reverted
- 06:3706:37, 18 July 2022 diff hist −1,218 History of Islam →Origins of Islam: Removed the quote due to: 1) He is bias. He wrote the cited source while working for a explicitly Christian University - https://www.messiah.edu/ 2) It contains wrong information, the Quran is referred to as a recital (not a book) which is in arabic not an arab book for arabs. - https://quran.com/search?page=1&q=arabic&translations=149,57 3) Rebutal: https://www.call-to-monotheism.com/rebuttal_to_answering_islam_s_article__mohammed_claimed_to_be_a_warner_only_for_arabia_ Tag: Reverted
27 June 2022
- 20:5420:54, 27 June 2022 diff hist −11 Ur →Prehistory: I have removed the word "derivative" since the word a) is "imitative of the work of another artist, writer, etc., and usually disapproved of for that reason" (google derivative meaning) and since it suggests that the Biblical story is "something which is based on another source." while scholars have noted similarities it is not a known fact that a) derives from b) I have therefore removed the word to reflect that. Tag: Reverted
- 11:4311:43, 27 June 2022 diff hist −1,443 Book of Jubilees →Subsequent use: I have shortened this section due to it needlesly quoting the listed scholar and thus clutters the wiki page.
- 11:4211:42, 27 June 2022 diff hist −755 Book of Jubilees →Subsequent use: I removed this earlier due to the fact that it uncritically, credulously and self-assured presents the mentioned scholar's claims without offering any analyzation or commentary. The reader doesn't even know whether or not it actually constitutes what the scholar claimed due to it being unsourced. It is also poorly written and reads like bias original research.
- 11:2611:26, 27 June 2022 diff hist −2,457 Book of Jubilees →Subsequent use Tag: Reverted
24 June 2022
- 19:2119:21, 24 June 2022 diff hist +9 Midrash →Contemporary views: I have changed what is written to make it more in line with what the cited source claims
19 June 2022
- 16:4116:41, 19 June 2022 diff hist +11 Oral-formulaic composition →Work of Parry and successors: Since the work in question isn't conclusive according to the cited sources own admission I have included the word "attempted" to reflect that
- 06:1406:14, 19 June 2022 diff hist −14 Kalki →People who have claimed to be Lord Kalki: "Fictiously" is a loaded and bias word. I have removed it to make what is written more neutral and accurate
18 June 2022
- 22:2122:21, 18 June 2022 diff hist −3,352 Oral tradition →Islam: I have removed parts of the text since it is superflous given the fact that the claim it makes is already complete and concise with what is already there. Tag: Reverted
- 21:4721:47, 18 June 2022 diff hist +9 Manichaeism →Influences: I have added the word "possibly" to be consistent with the previous usage of the word which has been used since the claim is not certain
31 May 2022
- 07:4407:44, 31 May 2022 diff hist +3 List of legends in the Quran →Jewish legends: I have changed the statements made to make it more concise and reflective of what is actually shown on the Wiki page. Because 1) the examples given here are not "many" but "some" 2) to claim that something is a "reference" is to claim that something is deliberately derived from what is referenced and that it is the same in content which is not substantiated.
23 May 2022
- 06:1206:12, 23 May 2022 diff hist −432 Sharia This part is highly inaccurate and presents a clear bias and ignorance regarding the topic hence why there are no credibale sourcing to it. Read more here: https://www.call-to-monotheism.com/does_islam_permit_muslim_men_to_rape_their_slave_girls_
15 May 2022
- 10:1610:16, 15 May 2022 diff hist +34 Salah →Etymology: https://quran.com/33:56/tafsirs/en-tafisr-ibn-kathir - I have added some details to clarify something and also removed a bit which gives a shout out to someone who is not a credible scholar but rather a polemic
12 May 2022
- 15:0215:02, 12 May 2022 diff hist −195 Khidr →Theories on origin: I have removed the section I removed because what is written there is repeated again later
9 May 2022
- 09:3009:30, 9 May 2022 diff hist +81 Khidr →Theories on origin: I have added some further information that was needed and changed the composition a bit so it is more accurate and easier to read
3 May 2022
- 14:1814:18, 3 May 2022 diff hist −1 Yahya Hassan →Death
- 14:1714:17, 3 May 2022 diff hist +112 Yahya Hassan →Death
- 14:1614:16, 3 May 2022 diff hist +225 Yahya Hassan →Death
15 April 2022
- 12:0812:08, 15 April 2022 diff hist +12 Late antiquity →The rise of Islam: Still is still the accepted view among scholars thus I have added (and after) to specify this since this is accepted history to this way and that the latter thesis is clearly still a revisionist theory regardless of it's merit
- 11:4911:49, 15 April 2022 diff hist +5 Late antiquity →The rise of Islam: I have changed the wording from "the modern way" (which is bias and wrongly suggest that this is the view that is accepted currently) to "a more recent these" (which reflect what is written here much better and is also balanced)
14 April 2022
- 00:5900:59, 14 April 2022 diff hist −671 Muslim population growth →Conversion: I have removed this section since it blatantly contradicts what has already been stated: "the number of people who become Muslims through conversion seems to be roughly equal to the number of Muslims who leave the faith" since it bears no purpose to the question of growth, it should not be included. Besides, there is no data provided in the source for the claim, just a couple cases and the article resemble a bias op-ed, not a inquiry into anything substantial about the topicl Tags: Reverted references removed
13 April 2022
- 08:4908:49, 13 April 2022 diff hist +10 Abd Allah ibn Sa'd →During Muhammad's era
- 08:4708:47, 13 April 2022 diff hist 0 Abd Allah ibn Sa'd →During Muhammad's era
- 08:4708:47, 13 April 2022 diff hist +1 Abd Allah ibn Sa'd →During Muhammad's era
- 08:4708:47, 13 April 2022 diff hist −28 Abd Allah ibn Sa'd →During Muhammad's era: I have removed the first statement because isn't backed up by proper sourcing. I have also specified that the mentioned Al-nuzul is a claim and I encourage that it is investigated further or changed to suit the nature of the claim since there really isn't a lot of collaborating evidence for it and plenty against it considering that the mentioned Surah is a meccan surrah and Abdallah converted after the hjira
10 April 2022
- 09:3209:32, 10 April 2022 diff hist +205 Menstruation in Islam No edit summary
- 09:2609:26, 10 April 2022 diff hist −54 Menstruation in Islam No edit summary
- 09:2509:25, 10 April 2022 diff hist +356 Menstruation in Islam No edit summary
- 09:1909:19, 10 April 2022 diff hist +65 Menstruation in Islam No edit summary
19 March 2022
- 20:5320:53, 19 March 2022 diff hist −16 Abraha →Islamic tradition
- 20:5220:52, 19 March 2022 diff hist +8 Abraha →Islamic tradition Tag: Disambiguation links added
- 20:4820:48, 19 March 2022 diff hist +6 Abraha →Islamic tradition
- 20:4720:47, 19 March 2022 diff hist +202 Abraha →Islamic tradition
- 20:3320:33, 19 March 2022 diff hist +2 Abraha →Islamic tradition
- 20:3020:30, 19 March 2022 diff hist +200 Abraha →Islamic tradition
- 20:2820:28, 19 March 2022 diff hist +7 Abraha →Islamic tradition
- 20:2520:25, 19 March 2022 diff hist +5 Abraha →Islamic tradition
- 20:2520:25, 19 March 2022 diff hist +331 Abraha →Islamic tradition: I have added this because it appears when you go on the "War Elephant" article here on Wikipedia and it is about this exact topic. Furthermore, I felt that it was important to note exactly who Daniel Beck is, and why he is arguing the things he is arguing. Thus the "revisionist" label is sufficient in light of the fact that his book is for that exact purpose, to be a revision of established history.
11 March 2022
- 11:5311:53, 11 March 2022 diff hist 0 Rima Ariadaeus →NASA photograph: It is misleading to use the word "Quranic" since the story and thus interpretation derives from Hadith not directly from the Quran itself which only mentions this story in 2 verses in a non-descriptive and highly interpretable manner. (See: Splitting of the Moon)
8 March 2022
- 16:5916:59, 8 March 2022 diff hist +7 Neo-Assyrian Empire I have changed the wording to accurately reflect what has been stated in this article. Tag: Reverted
- 11:2811:28, 8 March 2022 diff hist +10 Book of Exodus →Sources: I have made the wording more concise to reflect what has been claimed here
- 06:4106:41, 8 March 2022 diff hist +10 Book of Exodus →Sources: I have changed the wording to make it more consistent with what is being claimed in this section
30 August 2021
- 12:2712:27, 30 August 2021 diff hist −962 Old Testament messianic prophecies quoted in the New Testament →Debate about prophecy fulfillment: The quote is irelevant, and the one who makes it is not a scholar, it makes this section appear to have a bias, I have therefore removed it to reflect that Tag: Reverted
- 12:2412:24, 30 August 2021 diff hist +7 Old Testament messianic prophecies quoted in the New Testament →Debate about prophecy fulfillment: The citation only mentions one scholar and he never claims that it is concensus among scholars, he only presents his own view. I have therefore changed the context to reflect that Tag: Reverted
27 August 2021
- 19:0719:07, 27 August 2021 diff hist −79 Omniscience →Omniscience and the privacy of conscious experience: This part appears pointless and is very vague since it does not explain what is exactly meant by it. It's inclusion appears to stem from bias from whoever wrote it
- 19:0519:05, 27 August 2021 diff hist +2 Omniscience →Omniscience and the privacy of conscious experience: The "tried to avoid it" part is beneath this site and indicate bias from whoever wrote it, I changed it to "argued against" to make it more neutral
 | This is the contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |