Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Neuto Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Neuto Network

Cluster of interreleated likely WP:HOAX articles about television stations in Kenya (sometimes, but not always, persistently misspelled as "Kenia"), all completely unsupported by any proper verification of their existence in any sources of either the reliable or primary varieties.
The "main" website in Draft:Neuto Network does appear to exist, but leads to the website of a resort hotel chain in Southeast Asia, not a television network in Kenya, and virtually all other offsite links in any of these articles (whether used as references or external links) either 404 out or don't appear to contain any content about Kenyan television (e.g. pedriatics journal articles), and searching Google for any of these names also fails across the board to locate any verification of their existence whatsoever. Related pages at some of the same names were also created at simple: (right in mainspace as it doesn't have the same "anon IPs cannot create pages in mainspace" restriction that we do here), but have already been deleted as hoaxes. Bearcat (talk) 12:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I'm also adding another related page to this nomination that was created after this discussion was initiated. Also worthy of note, not that this is a deletion rationale in and of itself but it is indicative of the user's mindset, is that the pages are repeatedly getting readded to a mixture of bluelinked and redlinked categories no matter how many times they're removed on WP:DRAFTNOCAT grounds. Bearcat (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nominator. This is a walled garden that is a non-obvious hoax. The supposed web sites, several of which 404 out, and the main one of which is the authentic web site of an unrelated business, are further evidence that this is a hoax. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Walled gardens such as this are occasionally created, and are sufficiently uncommon that we do not need any special procedure for dealing with them, because they can be deleted after discussion, as we are doing. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.