Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fiddlekid's secret pages

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete all. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 15:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fiddlekid's secret pages[edit]

The vast majority of this user's edits are in the serspace (accroding to this tool, 74.31% in the User: namespace, 12.84% in the User talk: namespace). All the user's deleted edits (14) are secret page related; last article edit was nearly a year before the most recent edit. Delete all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User has only one hundred and something contribs. Kayau Voting IS evil 09:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The user doesn't seem to be here to help build an encyclopedia. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 20:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per WP:NOTMYSPACE and WP:UP#GAMES which states that examples of unrelated content to writing an encyclopedia are "[g]ames, roleplaying sessions, secret pages and other things pertaining to "entertainment" rather than "writing an encyclopedia". Such activities are generally frowned upon by the community, and where the games involve people who are not active participants in the project such pages are routinely deleted at MfD." Cunard (talk) 20:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per above. MER-C 09:29, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per Cunard (except for WP:NOTMYSPACE) and nom. Almost every edit is secret page related and is a flagrant violation of WP:UP#GAMES. No real indication user is here to improve WP. — Becksguy (talk) 10:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - User is not here to build an encyclopedia. ^Avic _ennasis @ 17:45, 17 Av 5770 / 28 July 2010 (UTC)
DELETE ALL. We have no business allowing these pages to exist anywhere on Wikipedia, I'm not sure why we ever make exceptions for things like this or "signature pages". JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 06:29, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.