[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wesalius/model

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Snowing. (non-admin closure) Queen of Heartstalk 00:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wesalius/model (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The predicted date for reaching 7 million articles will likely be inaccurate. Also, it will just keep changing every day, so we will never know exactly when Wikipedia will reach 7 million articles. So, such predictions are pointless and this user subpage (transcluded at User:Wbm1058) should be deleted. GTrang (talk) 14:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - a user subpage speculating on when 7m articles is reached is related to Wikipedia and a valid use of user space. So what if the prediction is inaccurate. And what of its transclusion? If the user who transcluded it wants it there, what of it? -- Whpq (talk) 18:19, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Nothing wrong with having a little counter gadget in one's own userspace. I'd equate it to creating a little clock display for current time in two time zones which I see fairly regularly. It's in the user's userspace, not harming anything, has no code syntax errors, and to the best of my knowledge, is not causing hardly any server load, so no justifiable reason to remove it. Accuracy/sources are not required in userspace, so why care if it's inaccurate? Zinnober9 (talk) 00:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - There were similar projections when we were approaching 6 million. No policy-based reason to delete, and maintaining interest in the seven million goal is a common sense reason to keep. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: In userspace, relevant-ish to the project. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 00:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Within the bounds of what we allow in userspace. Curbon7 (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Established contributors are allowed to keep false predictions or fringe opinions in their userspace. Air on White (talk) 23:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, what about the 8,000,000 article template? That'd be one going for the gold! Randy Kryn (talk) 00:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, inoffensive page. There's nothing wrong with it. 21 Andromedae (talk) 16:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.