Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Amandajm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete . G7ed by creator -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 12:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Amandajm[edit]

We recently cleaned up all RfAs that have never transcluded or run, after a troll spotted them and tried to get them running, and this is the last one left. It was created in good faith, but the nomination was declined. Amandajm would probably get some "support" votes if this did get transcluded so I can't speedy it per G6 as an obvious WP:NOTNOW, so this is the only other option. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment never thought I'd see an RfA at MfD. So no one wants to preserve that someone was nominated in the past? There is no archive? I'm happy to support delete if that's the best answer. Legacypac (talk) 23:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Defer to the opinion of Amandajm (talk · contribs), or invite Bigpoliticsfan (talk · contribs) to WP:CSD#G7 it. This should not have been nominated with waiting for a response. The first option of "do nothing" should have been more seriously considered, whatever embarrassment there may have been, this MfD only makes it worse. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:55, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.