Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/喆
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 18:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if there is a policy on these kinds of articles, but since no other article links to this and few users will have the ability to type Chinese characters, this article and the other one (below) seem to have very limited pratical value. Travelbird 17:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn SinoCharDef. 1971s Zhongwen Da Cidian (Great Dictionary of the Chinese Language), lists 49,888 characters. Let's not open the floodgates.--Fuhghettaboutit 17:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. —Mets501 (talk) 17:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Far too small, no real value as written. If someone were to expand upon it's etymological significance, that would be another issue. אמר Steve Caruso (desk/poll) 17:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'd appreciate a bigger article though. --Emc² (CONTACT ME) 18:36, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - agree with (User:mets501) - David Humphreys 18:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Would appreciate a bigger article, but with an English language title. Smerdis of Tlön 19:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, essentially a dicdef, no real significance stated, bad title (in the unlikely event this is kept, it needs to be renamed). --Coredesat talk 21:33, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for obvious (?) reason. SM247My Talk 23:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is the English Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 03:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wiktionary handles this sort of thing much better. Zetawoof(ζ) 07:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.