Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abena Agyeman-Fisher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abena Agyeman-Fisher

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. Columnist are not notable simply because they have a page on their employer's website. No evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:42, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as News, Books and browser found links but nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 07:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 18:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Same pattern: subject writes for many journals, many mentions, little coverage. It is unlikely that there are foreign-language sources about the subject as she lives in the US. Esquivalience ^t 21:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clearly not notable.Masterofroks (talk) 12:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.