Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aethel Mining

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aethel Mining

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

[1], [2] no independent anlysis, [3] not a news even, [4] just a line. [5] based on pr paterial, lusa etc. Editor is blocked for promoting the organisation and its founders. It fails WP:ORG Behind the moors (talk) 08:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 08:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 08:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 08:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Portugal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.