Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air14

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Notability sufficient to pass WP:GNG established. Very significant air show, 100th anniversary, etc. Referenced well enough to reliable sources, and more exist. Whether or not there are sockpuppets 'voting' in this AfD is irrelevant; the basis for keeping in policy/guideline is what is important, and that's been done here. Non-admin closure per WP:NAC #1. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Air14

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A one off air show is probably worthy of a sentence in the Swiss Air Force article, these types of one off air shows are not that uncommon but rarely notably for a stand-alone article The Banner talk 19:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is very unlikely that such an event will took place again in europe in the next 25years. It is not just one 08/15 airshow.An extraordinary, whit many special things and never before showed display parts. It was the biggest in europe, for this event the swiss post made extra stamps, swissmit extra 25Fr coins, it was broadcastet live on swiss TV and Internet, Speial never before shown programparts. The Books (eg Uno Zero Zero) and Magazins where printet for this unique airshow). It was a celebarting for 100 Years swiss air force , 50 years ptrouille Suisse and 25 years PC-7 Team at once. It is not possibel to bring all the informations about this airshow into the existing page about the swiss air force. This articel is well structured, contains a lot of informations and a detailed programm. So Keep.FFA P-16 (talk) 19:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It does seem to rather easily meet WP:GNG. You can find a good selection of news articles via this Gnews link and of course references do not have to be in English. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears to pass GNG, with plenty of press comment and issues to get their teeth into. I found plenty of reviews in English too, e.g. "AIR14 will probably go down in history as one of the best aviation events in Europe this decade, and for good reason." or "Probably the most talked about Air Show in 2014 was the modestly entitled Air14", try working through this search result. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 20:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep178.238.175.161 (talk) 00:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC) — 178.238.175.161 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep --MBurch (talk) 14:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This was not only an airshow out of several others. The media-coverage was worldwide, including live-streams via YT and free TV-channels. Due to the fact, that the Patrouille Suisse and the Swiss Air Force were celebrating their birthdays at this event, it is worth to keep this article in the en:WP. --M1712 (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC) — M1712 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

FYI: I have filed a sockpuppet investigation as I do not believe that all keep-voters are genuine editors. See: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FFA P-16. The Banner talk 00:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThe aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 14:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.