Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Laura Daniels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Laura Daniels

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable entertainer, no in depth coverage in reliable sources and nothing remarkable that would qualify under our N criteria. BEACHIDICAE🌊 14:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ARose Wolf 17:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to find enough sources to justify inclusion on WP. Angryapathy (talk) 19:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete I am new to this community and I guess we all have to start from somewhere. If you could kindly inform me about how many sources would be enough to justify it's inclusion on WP, I would kindly oblige and present them. This is a new article we are looking to improve over time so kindly bear with us. Mayorbiney
It's not about the number of sources, but the quality of them. I am extremely doubtful that there exists the significant coverage in reliable, independent sources that is required to justify an article. firefly ( t · c ) 11:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mayorbiney, a subject should be notable from the outset and sources should be provided when creating an article that will, at a minimum, pass the basic notability guidelines for inclusion. AfD is not for article clean-up. AfD is to determine whether there is a community consensus the subject meets the requirements mentioned above by Firefly. We conduct a WP:BEFORE search for reliable sources to verify notability which is what Firefly is referencing below. Please do not take anything said here personal against you. Editors are !voting based on what they determine when looking at the article themselves. --ARose Wolf 13:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mayorbiney, please do supply the sources that you have. It is ok if they are not in English or if they are not online, but they do need to conform to the guidelines laid out by firefly, i.e. significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Furius (talk) 16:52, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I likewise cannot find any significant coverage of this person. Mentions on a student blog do not count unfortunately. firefly ( t · c ) 11:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This read like a promotional piece. Mayorbiney, if you are new to this community, please accept this as a learning experience and consider the decent advice offered above. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Subject may be notable some day, but not yet.Rogermx (talk) 19:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.