Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Onraet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Even factoring out a single non-policy backed vote, there's clear consensus to back the deletion of this article as lacking in any notability from reliable sources.

As a minor adjunct, I am interested that if someone sets a trend for irregular bolded verbiage, most editors will follow suit ;) Nosebagbear (talk) 17:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Onraet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a procedural nomination, requested by 2A02:C7E:3438:AD00:A9C0:5E81:5251:4075 (talk · contribs). The rationale is "Hello, please could someone list the page Andrew Onraet for discussion on notability grounds as outline on that page's talk section? Thank you kindly". I am neutral Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Remove I can't really find much online about this chap beyond a few PR driven pieces about Von Essen in leisure trade press, which are now mostly disproved by more recent events, showing them as the product of PR consultants. The collapse as a result of huge bank loans of Von Essen shows this to be the case (the company not being funded by a wealthy Countess). Andrew Onraet's notability seems to be intriniscally linked to this PR driven rhetoric and therefore he doesn't meet the criteria for this article not to be deleted. GrouseyGrouse (talk) 11:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I work in architecture in the UK and have never heard of this guy or his company — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7E:3438:AD00:8D94:2A87:87E0:38CC (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Copied over from my post on the page's tak page which triggered the discussion. Have done a lot of web searching and can't really find much info about this gentleman beyond his work for Von Essen, which mainly seems to stem from being the partner of the owner of the company. I work in the architecture industry and have never heard of him, his company seems to have closed down with no trace https://aeonarchitects.com/ of where he has gone next and therefore I don't feel he meets the notability threshold. Last time this was nominated for deletion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Andrew_Onraet it was kept on the basis that someone outside the industry felt it should be kept, but with their own admission that they didn't know if he was notable within the industry. He isn't. His LinkedIn profile only shows 3 connections also https://uk.linkedin.com/in/andrewonraet . He is also not currently a director of any companies at companies house https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/QcmNlHSlUlZBDDhATLrKR7Cj7Ic/appointments and AEON architects does not exist as a company. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/search?q=aeon%20architects — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7E:3438:AD00:1D3:83F7:4BF8:BD5F (talk) 16:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing here is an RS. Everything seems to be a puff piece with clear involvement of the subject in every source with direct quotations from him. Nothing about him that is both independent and robust. Fails WP:GNG. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.