Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Renowitzky
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. LFaraone 00:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Arthur Renowitzky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable rapper. Koala15 (talk) 02:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 7. Snotbot t • c » 03:19, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just being a hip-hop musician does not make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 00:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Appears at least locally notable per references cited in the article, including full articles about him and his nonprofit organization by the Oakland Tribune and a local TV station. --MelanieN (talk) 22:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I added the Oakland Tribune reference, and I'd lean towards MelanieN's position regarding the subject's notability. I don't see a policy-based reason for deletion being put forward here. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 00:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.